Taiwan has witnessed two transfers of political power, and both times there has been an almost imperceptible appeal for “transitional justice.” However, there are many people in Taiwan who have little idea of what that term means, and have less interest in finding out.
It is not an appeal you usually hear when political parties hand over the reins of government in other nations: It is only heard in nations where a totalitarian regime has been replaced.
In its most extreme form, transitional justice resorts to revolution. In the French Revolution of 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1917, members of the monarchy and aristocracy were either executed or exiled. The communist revolution in China saw landlords throughout the country called to account. Much blood was shed in these events but, to those whisked up into the revolutions, this was all a form of transitional justice.
After World War II, those that had conspired toward, instigated or participated in the invasion of other countries were prosecuted as war criminals. Those guilty of serious crimes were sentenced to death, while those convicted of lesser crimes were purged and banned from participating in politics.
When West Germany and East Germany were reunified, government officials, academics, writers and artists who had colluded with the communist regime in East Germany were purged. They were not punished, but they lost their social standing. This was how transitional justice was achieved.
After the Chinese Civil War, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retreated to Taiwan, Taiwanese were subjected to one-party totalitarian rule and many horrors, including the 228 Incident. People who opposed the KMT’s policy of “retaking the mainland” and “unifying China,” or who pushed for democracy, freedom and human rights were arrested, imprisoned or otherwise done away with. They were made to “disappear.”
It is unconscionable that the KMT — after having its national policy exposed as horribly flawed — was able to do an about face as if nothing had happened and cozy up to the Chinese Communist Party, paving the way for the annexation of Taiwan. Have these former rulers, who formulated and long pursued a flawed policy; who misled the nation and the people living in it; and who slayed innocent civilians in the process, ever shown the tiniest bit of remorse? Have they uttered a single phrase by way of apology? Has the party done anything to atone for its past sins? No, no, and in all cases, no.
There is no shortage of candidates for serious punishment in this nation, although perhaps executions and exile orders can be dispensed for now.
The perpetrators of these past crimes have long lived the good life, staying well beyond the arm of the law. All the while, they have been trying to blind the public with slogans such as “forget past enmities, we are all in this together,” persuading Taiwanese to forget that forgiveness and reconciliation are the exclusive rights of the wronged, as they occupied the top of Taiwan’s socio-economic pile. This being the case, people have no idea how to even start looking for transitional justice.
Democracy elsewhere is made of pure and refined stuff. Taiwan’s is rough, spurious and contaminated. It is a shame for ordinary Taiwanese that transitional justice is always something on the horizon, something the public does not feel justified in reaching out for. Instead, most Taiwanese merely sigh and try to convince themselves that a more robust democracy is something they need to wait patiently for.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,