Although there are more than three months to go until president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is sworn in as president, the quick response from her and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) following the earthquake that hit southern Taiwan shows the party is ready to govern the nation.
When the earthquake hit at 3:57am yesterday, several buildings collapsed in Tainan, and Mayor William Lai (賴清德) quickly arrived at the scene of the disaster to coordinate rescue efforts.
Although most DPP members had left on Friday evening for the Lunar New Year holiday, the party’s emergency response system was activated before daybreak, when people in relatively unaffected areas were still asleep.
A little after 7am, Tsai issued orders to local governments headed by the DPP, as well as local party chapters, to step up efforts to assist rescue efforts.
At 8:30am, Tsai, vice president-elect Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) and DPP Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) were at party headquarters in Taipei to discuss disaster relief measures, before Wu headed to Tainan to coordinate rescue efforts.
Tsai announced that she would cancel all scheduled Lunar New Year events from tomorrow through Thursday, and the party donated NT$1 million (US$29,833) for disaster relief.
By that time, DPP-run local governments across the nation had dispatched more than 300 rescue workers to join the efforts to search for survivors in the early hours of the morning.
The central government also mobilized rescue efforts, including opening the Central Emergency Operations Center, while President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Simon Chang (張善政) went to Tainan to inspect the quake-hit areas.
While it is part of the government’s job to respond quickly when disasters hit, it is surprising to see that the DPP — formally an opposition party — could coordinate resources and deliver them to the disaster area so quickly.
More importantly, Tsai’s decision to remain in Taipei and send Wu instead of traveling to Tainan herself as many political leaders — such as Ma — would do, shows that she cares about helping the victims, not appearing before cameras.
It definitely “looks good” when political leaders show up at disaster areas to show that they care, but when leaders like the president or the president-elect do so, it often makes disaster scenes even more disastrous.
When a president or a president-elect travels, they have to be escorted by dozens of security personnel. In addition, before and during their visits, national security staffers as well as local police officers have to inspect the places they intend to visit and accompany them as they appear before the public.
Such moves only disrupt rescue efforts, as some rescue workers might have to stop what they are doing to provide security for the leaders and emergency vehicles might need to give way to the presidential motorcade.
One of the best known examples of how government officials’ “inspections” of disaster areas might lead to more trouble was seen when then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) took a helicopter to meet with victims in Nantou County after the 921 Earthquake in 1999.
When his helicopter landed, the wind from the propeller blew away the tents used by survivors as temporary shelters and blew down a tree, killing one girl.
Tsai’s ability to coordinate efforts within the party separately from the government and her decision not to travel to the disaster area show that the DPP is ready to govern.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS