At a televised debate between the presidential candidates last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that the economy could be stimulated by gradually raising the minimum monthly wage to NT$30,000 in four years.
EasyCard Corp chairman Kenneth Lin (林向愷) and National Taiwan University professor Hsin Ping-lung (辛炳隆) supported Chu’s proposal, while former National Science Council minister Cyrus Chu (朱敬一) and Gordon Sun (孫明德), head of the Macroeconomic Forecasting Center at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, opposed it. Cyrus Chu said that proposing to stimulate the economy by raising the minimum wage was “brainless.”
In the US, it would probably be feasible to boost the economy by increasing salaries. Americans tend to be more optimistic and consumption is more likely to increase as incomes increase, as most people would not prioritize increasing their savings.
However, the situation is different in Taiwan, where wages have remained stagnant for the past 16 years. Taiwanese have experienced hardship for a long time and many do not see a possible change in the future. Even if the minimum wage is increased, people would be less likely to increase consumption and more likely to increase savings.
In 2009, the government spent NT$85.8 billion (US$2.54 billion) to distribute vouchers in an attempt to boost consumption, but the stimulus policy boosted GDP by only NT$36.3 billion, adding a mere 0.24 percentage points to economic growth.
Raising the minimum wage is not an effective way of boosting the economy.
The minimum wage in Taiwan is NT$20,008 per month, but at least 700,000 Taiwanese are making less than that. By gradually increasing the minimum wage by NT$10,000 over four years, as Chu proposed, large companies catering to the domestic market would inevitably lay off large numbers of employees and small companies would be forced to either pay low wages illegally or close down. Companies operating in the international market, meanwhile, would probably leave Taiwan.
Investing in the nation’s export-oriented manufacturing industry would be more likely to boost economic growth. Japan’s post-war revitalization, Taiwan’s economic miracle and China’s rise all relied heavily on their export-oriented manufacturing industries.
Taiwan needs to relax its foreign worker policy, introduce flexible wages and allow the number of workers to fluctuate in accordance with market demand. Doing this would cause Taiwanese manufacturers that have gone overseas to relocate back to Taiwan, or at least move production lines back to Taiwan to handle new orders. An output of NT$1 in the manufacturing industry generates an output of NT$1.4 in the service industry, so Taiwan’s GDP would rebound, or at least improve.
For example, if overseas laptop or smartphone assembly operations were to relocate back to Taiwan, they could create at least 1 million new jobs. Even if they employed 700,000 foreign workers, they would still have to hire 300,000 local workers. The oversupply of local workers would disappear and demand for labor would increase, causing employers to increase the starting salary for Taiwanese entering the workforce to NT$30,000 per month, or they would be unable to hire enough local workers.
Unfortunately, Lin, Hsin, Cyrus Chu and Sun all support upgrading Taiwanese industry, innovation and transformation, while opposing the relaxation of Taiwan’s foreign-worker policy or pursuit of low-value-added goods.
William Kao is president of the Victims of Investment in China Association.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS