China used to call the investments and marketing activities of multinational corporations in other nations an “economic invasion.” However, the real economic invasion is the current international expansion of Chinese corporations, with the Chinese government pulling the strings behind private businesses.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd chairman Jack Ma’s (馬雲) recent acquisition of Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd is considered by some to be an attempt to help Beijing improve its image.
When China employs this tactic against Taiwan, it is working toward annexation. It has long been China’s understanding that buyiing off Taiwan is less costly than an all-out military offensive.
For the past seven years, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has made a complete mess of the economy. He has used the capital gains tax to destroy the stock market, causing an outflow of Taiwanese capital and keeping the market’s price-earnings ratio low, thus making it convenient for China to acquire vital Taiwanese industries.
There is reason to question whether Ma is collaborating with Beijing.
Chinese company Tsinghua Unigroup Inc’s bid to take stahes in Siliconware Precision Industries Co and MediaTek Inc — the threat to ban imports of MediaTek products into China says it all — and Minister of Economic Affairs John Deng’s (鄧振中) comments on deregulating Chinese acquisitions seem to reflect what Ma has in mind.
The Chinese acquisition campaign could seriously affect Taiwan’s national security, but Ma has not said anything about that, which also says something.
Having discovered the intent behind the Chinese acquisitions, the US, South Korea and Australia have taken measures to restrain such investments. However, Taiwan, which has long been the prey of the Chinese, finds its government willingly opening its doors to welcome the predator.
Taiwanese must keep an eye on a traitorous government like this.
China stops at nothing in its invasive foreign economic expansion, as evidenced by Indonesia’s choice for its high-speed rail project. Since 2008, Japan had been in talks with Indonesia on building a high-speed rail line connecting Jakarta and Bandung, and had begun comprehensive preparations for the preliminary engineering and submitted a geological map. In early September this year, the Indonesian government rejected China’s bid, which was submitted only half a year ago. However, after Beijing treated several Indonesian officials to a trip to China, it was awarded the project later that month, despite not having made any preparations for preliminary engineering.
Some Japanese media outlets speculated that Beijing had bribed the Indonesian officials to hand the Japanese studies to China. In return, China would not require the Indonesian government to offer any debt guarantees. It would be a deal between the two nations’ private sectors, which means that if in the future the Indonesian company defaults on its payments, China would have a hard time holding Indonesia accountable.
Is an engineering project like this viable or is there a risk that it will be left unfinished?
Tsinghua Unigroup, which aims to grab control of Taiwan’s core industry, is a corporation under China’s Tsinghua Holdings, and Hu Haifeng (胡海峰), the son of former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), was secretary of Tsinghua Holdings’ branch of the Chinese Communist Party.
In 2009, Tsinghua Tongfang Co, a major Chinese computer maker, was placed under investigation for alleged fraud and bribery in Namibia. Two Namibians and one Chinese were arrested in the African nation, and Hu Haifeng was to be investigated as a witness, prompting his dismissal by Tsinghua.
Ma administration officials and some Taiwanese businesspeople have a tendency to shake in their boots when they have to deal with China. Do they have the nerve to stop the Chinese economic invasion?
Even if Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co puts in a considerable effort to prepare to invest in Nanjing, will the company be able to hold its ground when the Chinese government makes threats by arresting its senior managers, as it did years ago to Chimei Innolux Corp, Taiwan’s largest LCD panel maker?
If Ma abruptly decides to sell Taiwan out to China so that China will care for him after he retires from his presidency, Taiwanese must take immediate action to stop him.
Slacking off now could result in regrets that could last for centuries.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS