A western philosopher once referred to “a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that is not there.” It is a comment on the metaphysical dilemma in which academics have exhausted big efforts on the dialectical wording for the non-existence of being.
On the contrary, Taiwan, as an existing political entity, has passed the progressive Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act (溫室氣體減量及管理法), and outlined its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) — publicly declared actions the nation intends to take under a new global climate change agreement. However, it still cannot officially participate in the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris with 195 other parties.
As for the ranking of carbon dioxide emitting nations, Taiwan was not originally shown on the world map. However, since the 1970s, the nation’s economic transition, industrialization, rise in exports and GDP growth have made Taiwan one of the four Asian Tigers and one of the world’s major industrial factories.
As a result, Taiwan has imported more coal and oil, and carbon dioxide emissions have increased annually by 6 to 8 percent. With the increased pollution, the sky over Taiwan has also grown dusky. Although small, Taiwan is a major emitter in the eyes of the International Energy Agency (IEA). However, in the eyes of the world, the nation is always seen by choice, or not seen at all.
The situation has changed since 2008. Taiwan’s overall emissions have more or less leveled off over the past seven years despite an increase in GDP. The intensity of Taiwan’s carbon dioxide emissions has fallen from 0.023kg per New Taiwan (NT) dollar in 2002 to 0.017kg per NT dollar in 2013 — a decrease of about 25 percent over the past 12 years — mainly as a result of an improvement in energy efficiency, industrial transformation and energy conservation, and carbon emissions reduction efforts. This transition pathway could be a remarkable demonstration for many developing countries.
If Taiwan were a member of the UN Climate Change Conference, it would appeal some points at the meetings:
‧ First, pay attention to the effects of global warming and sea-level rise on island countries in the Pacific, Indian and Caribbean oceans.
‧ Second, treat “historical responsibility” and “future responsibility” of greenhouse gas emissions equally.
‧ Third, establish a fair, third-party verification platform to audit countries’ greenhouse gas emissions, use it to support domestic allocation of emission allowances and establish a credible basis for a carbon market;
‧ Fourth, improve functions of international collaboration platforms on technology, finance, and law, in order to complete a transition from a “carbon economy” to a “green economy.”
Since 1992, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has embodied the “common, but differentiated responsibilities” as the UN’s emissions mitigation commitment.
However, this concept has not resulted in a satisfied realization. Greenhouse gas emissions are still running out of control.
It is our proposal that in the upcoming “Paris Agreement,” an “inclusive” component needs be added to the “common, but differentiated responsibilities;” rephrasing the concept as “common, but differentiated, and inclusive responsibilities.”
The UN should include, with the utmost generosity, all political entities that are willing and/or capable of contributing to carbon emissions reduction under the UNFCCC. In turn, our nation, people and cities would be treated more equally in dedicating their effort and financial capacity for human sustainability.
Wei Kuo-yen is the Environmental Protection Administration minister.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS