When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) nominated former Council of Labor Affairs minister Jennifer Wang (王如玄) as his running mate two weeks ago, most Taiwanese were bewildered as to why an already unpopular candidate would want to invite an equally, if not more, unpopular politician to join his ticket.
Despite being a long-time advocate of women’s rights, Wang was quite a controversial figure during her four-and-a-half-year tenure as head of the council from May 2008 to October 2012.
In early 2012, Wang spent nearly NT$20 million (US$607,256) filing lawsuits against former employees of textile and electronics manufacturers who were unable to repay the loans provided to them by the council in 1997 in lieu of the layoff and retirement payments owed to them by their employers. They were let go after the unannounced closures of their companies in the 1990s.
She is also believed to be behind an unpaid leave system and a champion of the 2009 implementation of the government’s “22K policy” — whereby companies that hired new graduates were provided subsidies to make up a monthly wage of NT$22,000 — a scheme much loathed by young people, who blame it for their current low starting salaries.
In 2013, Wang served as one of the defense attorneys for former prosecutor-general Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘), who was accused of illegally leaking confidential information regarding an ongoing judicial probe into the alleged improper use of influence by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
In light of all the controversies surrounding Jennifer Wang — ranging from her alleged speculation with military housing units and allegedly illegal residence in a government dormitory, to the questionable omission of her doctorate from Beijing’s Renmin University of China on her campaign Web site — the reason for Chu’s selection of Wang is clear: She has been chosen to serve as his human shield.
Since her nomination, almost all the criticism of the Chu-Wang campaign — from the public or from those in the pan-green camp — has been directed at her.
In the past few weeks, the media frenzy over Jennifer Wang has put her in the headlines more frequently than Chu, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) or Tsai’s well-liked running mate, former Academia Sinica vice president Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁).
Hardly anyone is still talking about Chu’s contentious decision to walk away from his duty as New Taipei City mayor for three months to focus on his campaign; his yet-to-be-honored 2010 campaign pledge to add “three rings and three lines” to the Taipei metro rail system, which involves the construction of a series of MRT lines and light-railway systems; or his alleged favoring of a corporation owned by his father-in-law in the Taoyuan Aerotropolis project.
In addition, the KMT’s list of legislator-at-large candidates has been described as the “lamest in history” and drawn criticism even from within the party.
These concerns have been overshadowed by Jennifer Wang’s more headline-grabbing shortcomings.
The media are focusing on exactly how many military apartments Wang has purchased, whether she will move into another government dormitory after the election is over, or why she failed to mention her doctorate on her and Chu’s official campaign Web site.
With Wang on the front line drawing all the fire, Chu is able to sit back and relax until the conclusion of the Jan. 16 presidential election in which he is doomed to be defeated.
It is possible that he remains unscathed from the mudslinging of his opponents and the media’s attempts to dredge up skeletons from his past and emerges smelling of roses when the election brouhaha dies down.
Sadly, the same cannot be said for Wang.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS