When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) nominated former Council of Labor Affairs minister Jennifer Wang (王如玄) as his running mate two weeks ago, most Taiwanese were bewildered as to why an already unpopular candidate would want to invite an equally, if not more, unpopular politician to join his ticket.
Despite being a long-time advocate of women’s rights, Wang was quite a controversial figure during her four-and-a-half-year tenure as head of the council from May 2008 to October 2012.
In early 2012, Wang spent nearly NT$20 million (US$607,256) filing lawsuits against former employees of textile and electronics manufacturers who were unable to repay the loans provided to them by the council in 1997 in lieu of the layoff and retirement payments owed to them by their employers. They were let go after the unannounced closures of their companies in the 1990s.
She is also believed to be behind an unpaid leave system and a champion of the 2009 implementation of the government’s “22K policy” — whereby companies that hired new graduates were provided subsidies to make up a monthly wage of NT$22,000 — a scheme much loathed by young people, who blame it for their current low starting salaries.
In 2013, Wang served as one of the defense attorneys for former prosecutor-general Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘), who was accused of illegally leaking confidential information regarding an ongoing judicial probe into the alleged improper use of influence by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
In light of all the controversies surrounding Jennifer Wang — ranging from her alleged speculation with military housing units and allegedly illegal residence in a government dormitory, to the questionable omission of her doctorate from Beijing’s Renmin University of China on her campaign Web site — the reason for Chu’s selection of Wang is clear: She has been chosen to serve as his human shield.
Since her nomination, almost all the criticism of the Chu-Wang campaign — from the public or from those in the pan-green camp — has been directed at her.
In the past few weeks, the media frenzy over Jennifer Wang has put her in the headlines more frequently than Chu, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) or Tsai’s well-liked running mate, former Academia Sinica vice president Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁).
Hardly anyone is still talking about Chu’s contentious decision to walk away from his duty as New Taipei City mayor for three months to focus on his campaign; his yet-to-be-honored 2010 campaign pledge to add “three rings and three lines” to the Taipei metro rail system, which involves the construction of a series of MRT lines and light-railway systems; or his alleged favoring of a corporation owned by his father-in-law in the Taoyuan Aerotropolis project.
In addition, the KMT’s list of legislator-at-large candidates has been described as the “lamest in history” and drawn criticism even from within the party.
These concerns have been overshadowed by Jennifer Wang’s more headline-grabbing shortcomings.
The media are focusing on exactly how many military apartments Wang has purchased, whether she will move into another government dormitory after the election is over, or why she failed to mention her doctorate on her and Chu’s official campaign Web site.
With Wang on the front line drawing all the fire, Chu is able to sit back and relax until the conclusion of the Jan. 16 presidential election in which he is doomed to be defeated.
It is possible that he remains unscathed from the mudslinging of his opponents and the media’s attempts to dredge up skeletons from his past and emerges smelling of roses when the election brouhaha dies down.
Sadly, the same cannot be said for Wang.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS