There is a saying that goes: “Money can’t buy everything, but without it, you can’t do anything.”
Then there is the Taiwanese proverb: “The children of the wealthy never turn out well.”
What ties these expressions together? Money: what it gets you, and what too much begets.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is the world’s richest political party, with tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars in assets, but even this much money could not prevent it from being severely bested in last year’s nine-in-one elections. Its assets, on the surface, are a resource, but in reality are a burden to it; the source of its troubles.
The existence of the KMT’s assets robs it of any claim to righteousness. Accounting for their existence by saying they are the product of mistakes that occurred at a time when the party and the state were inseparable does not in any way justify or explain the illicit assets.
All of the industries and assets owned by the KMT were taken from the defeated Japanese or from the national coffers when the KMT arrived in Taiwan after World War II, or are “derivatives,” commandeered from state-owned real estate at a low price or for no money at all. The fruit of the poisonous tree is itself poisonous. Any wealth that derives from these dodgy dealings is tainted, too.
Even now the KMT insists on clinging to its “precious,” using the assets for its own purposes. It refuses to sell them off or return them. This not only creates an uneven political playing field, it also sets a bad example for society: that money is central, while principles and justice are set to the side.
The KMT has created a culture of corruption.
In 2005, when President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) were competing for the position of KMT chairman, Ma accused Wang of being corrupt, using the phrase “black gold.” In so doing, Ma was essentially absolving himself of involvement with corruption, and ignoring the KMT’s own system and the way that it had been governing through corrupt means.
It was at this time that the adjective “black,” which was previously reserved for corruption and the criminal underworld, took on a new meaning in Taiwan, that of the “black box” way of negotiating agreements and decisionmaking through entirely non-transparent means.
Was this not the way the Ma administration negotiated the terms of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), the cross-strait trade in services agreement, adjustments to the school curriculum guidelines and the meeting in Singapore with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)?
In the past, the KMT was successful because of the connections and networks it made at the grassroots level. The polite way to say this would be that it established an extensive and tight-knit network, although it might be more accurate to say that the money flowed far and wide.
The KMT’s assets have turned elections into a game of those who have and those who have not.
Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) had to make do with meager campaign donations for her short-lived campaign for the presidency this year. For Hung, it was assets, assets everywhere, and not a cent to bring: no cash was forthcoming from the party coffers for her. At this point, the campaign was truly moribund. Then Hung was ousted and replaced by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), and suddenly the money rained down on him, greasing the party machine and bringing it into motion.
The problem is, what can a governing party bring to the nation if it only shows unity when the cash comes rolling in?
Does that spell fortune or disaster?
Once again, the temple troupes are marching in the streets and coach-loads of people are being shuttled free of charge to scenic areas.
Who, pray tell, is paying? Where is the money for all this coming from?
Especially today, when times are hard, pockets are shallow and the media industry is in its twilight years, the KMT is bringing its prodigious assets to bear, splashing cash like a sugar daddy out on the town. One fears that the media are increasingly less able to resist such offers or to swim in the other direction.
Numbers speak volumes. Eight or nine out of 10 elected representatives of all levels who have had their electoral victories declared null and void due to graft are affiliated with the KMT.
Money is the main culprit; if this is not all down to the KMT’s party assets, then what is it down to? In the interest of leveling the political playing field, of consigning corruption and vote-buying to history, those with the right to vote should exercise it to say to the KMT, which has done so much damage to Taiwan: “No more.”
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS