Does US value democracy?
William Lowther’s article on Noah Feldman’s comments (“Professor says Xi signals a ‘respectful’ meeting with Taiwan’s next government,” Nov. 22, page 3) makes one wonder if principle and integrity matter in US policy.
Feldman says nothing about the will of the Taiwanese and instead talks about Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) nationalistic aspirations. Is freedom and democracy no longer of particular concern to people like Feldman and Lowther?
If not, then a warning was sent to all US allies in Asia: Do not rely on the US as an ally.
Taiwanese will, sooner or later, vote for independence. If the US believes in democracy and freedom as it says it does, then it should state clearly that it will support the democratically expressed will of Taiwanese, whether that offends the Chinese Communist Party or not.
Gavan Duffy
Australia
Aiming to be ‘frozen garlic’
There are several interesting phenomena in the campaigns for the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections.
The three presidential tickets each involve running mates from opposite sexes, showing that women are gaining political power. There are four party chairpersons, two on one ticket; one party is pan-green and three are pan-blue.
All six candidates have doctorates in different fields. Hopefully, the next administration will be wise in its policymaking and friendly when approaching people.
All three tickets use a circle as a part of their logos. Two tickets use “Taiwan” in their slogans and one ticket uses a circle crossed by a square from the left to form a map of Taiwan. Taiwan is a popular name and symbol in elections. None of the three tickets use the “Republic of China (ROC)” or “Chinese Taipei” in their slogans.
Some legislative candidates hide or minimize their party emblem on their campaign brochures. Two parties have similar emblems, but with different sizes.
Whenever there is a campaign rally, all candidates on the stage stand hand-in-hand, and loudly and repeatedly shout candidates’ names and “Dong-suan,” which means “Be elected” in Taiwanese, but is written in Chinese as “凍蒜” which means “frozen garlic.” What a loss in translation.
Thirty years ago, there was a one-party dictatorship. Now there are a dozen parties competing for 113 legislative seats, including 33 legislators-at-large. Some candidates even cry, kneel, kiss the ground or worship in temples for votes.
Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) is a veteran legislative speaker, but has been discriminated against by some leaders of his own party. He was blocked from running for president, but he remains loyal to the party after he was nominated as the No. 1 candidate on the legislator-at-large list. If possible, he wishes to be the speaker again.
There are some unique election terms as well: “Rubbing dough balls to make soup” means paying off a competitor to drop from the race; a “5:5 wave” means a tight race; an election is described as “an election war”; “painting black” means defaming a competitor; “sweeping the street” means campaigning on streets or in public places.
However, when a candidate wins the election, they become “frozen garlic.”
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Remember to conserve water
As Taiwan is now into the dry season and will probably not have any significant rainfall until the middle of next year, I feel a need to bring to people’s attention the water restrictions we faced earlier this year.
Many cities and townships had severe water restrictions and Kaohsiung was only a day or two from having water cut off for two days a week. This sent people to the local stores to buy large containers to fill with water, which would defeat the purpose of cutting off the water to conserve it.
I pass over the Gaoping River (高屏溪) daily and already I can see that the water level is low and it is only November. Might I ask what the Taiwan Water Corp (台灣自來水), the national government and local governments are doing to promote water conservation?
I see people wasting water, a very precious resource, on a daily basis. I read that cleaning the silt from reservoirs to improve storage capacity is deemed too costly. What cost would the nation incur when we run out of water? Conservation of our resources is something that should be promoted by all of us.
Although about 70 percent of the Earth’s surface is covered with water, only 1 percent of that water is potable. Water is not an infinite resource and unless we start conserving it now, the taps will be running dry very soon.
Nick Pond
Kaohsiung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS