Does US value democracy?
William Lowther’s article on Noah Feldman’s comments (“Professor says Xi signals a ‘respectful’ meeting with Taiwan’s next government,” Nov. 22, page 3) makes one wonder if principle and integrity matter in US policy.
Feldman says nothing about the will of the Taiwanese and instead talks about Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) nationalistic aspirations. Is freedom and democracy no longer of particular concern to people like Feldman and Lowther?
If not, then a warning was sent to all US allies in Asia: Do not rely on the US as an ally.
Taiwanese will, sooner or later, vote for independence. If the US believes in democracy and freedom as it says it does, then it should state clearly that it will support the democratically expressed will of Taiwanese, whether that offends the Chinese Communist Party or not.
Gavan Duffy
Australia
Aiming to be ‘frozen garlic’
There are several interesting phenomena in the campaigns for the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections.
The three presidential tickets each involve running mates from opposite sexes, showing that women are gaining political power. There are four party chairpersons, two on one ticket; one party is pan-green and three are pan-blue.
All six candidates have doctorates in different fields. Hopefully, the next administration will be wise in its policymaking and friendly when approaching people.
All three tickets use a circle as a part of their logos. Two tickets use “Taiwan” in their slogans and one ticket uses a circle crossed by a square from the left to form a map of Taiwan. Taiwan is a popular name and symbol in elections. None of the three tickets use the “Republic of China (ROC)” or “Chinese Taipei” in their slogans.
Some legislative candidates hide or minimize their party emblem on their campaign brochures. Two parties have similar emblems, but with different sizes.
Whenever there is a campaign rally, all candidates on the stage stand hand-in-hand, and loudly and repeatedly shout candidates’ names and “Dong-suan,” which means “Be elected” in Taiwanese, but is written in Chinese as “凍蒜” which means “frozen garlic.” What a loss in translation.
Thirty years ago, there was a one-party dictatorship. Now there are a dozen parties competing for 113 legislative seats, including 33 legislators-at-large. Some candidates even cry, kneel, kiss the ground or worship in temples for votes.
Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) is a veteran legislative speaker, but has been discriminated against by some leaders of his own party. He was blocked from running for president, but he remains loyal to the party after he was nominated as the No. 1 candidate on the legislator-at-large list. If possible, he wishes to be the speaker again.
There are some unique election terms as well: “Rubbing dough balls to make soup” means paying off a competitor to drop from the race; a “5:5 wave” means a tight race; an election is described as “an election war”; “painting black” means defaming a competitor; “sweeping the street” means campaigning on streets or in public places.
However, when a candidate wins the election, they become “frozen garlic.”
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Remember to conserve water
As Taiwan is now into the dry season and will probably not have any significant rainfall until the middle of next year, I feel a need to bring to people’s attention the water restrictions we faced earlier this year.
Many cities and townships had severe water restrictions and Kaohsiung was only a day or two from having water cut off for two days a week. This sent people to the local stores to buy large containers to fill with water, which would defeat the purpose of cutting off the water to conserve it.
I pass over the Gaoping River (高屏溪) daily and already I can see that the water level is low and it is only November. Might I ask what the Taiwan Water Corp (台灣自來水), the national government and local governments are doing to promote water conservation?
I see people wasting water, a very precious resource, on a daily basis. I read that cleaning the silt from reservoirs to improve storage capacity is deemed too costly. What cost would the nation incur when we run out of water? Conservation of our resources is something that should be promoted by all of us.
Although about 70 percent of the Earth’s surface is covered with water, only 1 percent of that water is potable. Water is not an infinite resource and unless we start conserving it now, the taps will be running dry very soon.
Nick Pond
Kaohsiung
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS