US President Barack Obama naming Taiwan as one of the US’ partners in the global battle against terrorism might have come across as a nod to the nation’s aid to Syrian refugees to some, but his remarks at the East Asia Summit in Kuala Lumpur were not only hypocritical, but have put the nation in danger of being targeted by Muslim extremists.
What Taiwan has done to empower Syrian refugees is remotely, if at all, relevant to tensions between the US and Muslim nations or militia. The contributions Taiwan made were driven by its commitment to humanitarian relief — it has not made any official statements or entered into any agreements with the US or any other nation to take on Muslim extremists.
Taiwan is generally neutral and harmless to Muslims, which has left many at a loss as to why the nation has been targeted by the Islamic State (IS) group, and Obama failed to do Taiwan any justice by naming it as a partner in the US’ antiterrorism campaign.
The move is especially reprehensible when one considers the limited role the US has played in helping Taiwan join any international organizations that would help it break free from Beijing’s shackles.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Wednesday made a timely and emphatic point when he said that the US has adopted a nonchalant stance on Taiwan’s bids to join the UN or other organizations, and that Obama only mentions Taiwan when he wants to conduct business or assign work.
It is evident that Obama’s recent trip to Asia is part of Washington’s move to push its “pivot to Asia” policy, aimed at restoring the US’ economic and strategic influence, and weakening China’s growing dominance in the region. His deliberate omission of China as a partner against terrorism has further underlined that point, given that Beijing last week vowed to tackle terrorists after footage purportedly released by IS showed the beheading of a Chinese hostage.
While the US retains an important role in maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, Obama should not have gotten Taiwan involved in the US’ war against militant Muslim groups, which has put Taiwan’s national security at risk. After all, the US has been aloof about Taiwan’s struggle to fight for international space for so long, and there is no justifying Obama’s dangerous name-throwing just to further the US’ own political aims.
An IS threat to target Taiwan led some to panic, but it also produced a rare example of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) acting in unison.
Although the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, unaware of the ensuing danger, expressed its gratitude over Obama’s recognition of Taiwan’s efforts to counter terrorism, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) clarified the nation’s role in the global fight against terrorism, saying that its efforts only included humanitarian relief assistance and that such actions are not directed at IS.
Ministry spokeswoman Eleanor Wang (王珮玲) made it clear that the nation’s role in the fight against terrorism is confined to providing humanitarian and emergency response assistance — comments that were echoed by DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who called on China to step up its commitment to combat terrorists.
As with any talks at the international level, the two parties, intentionally or otherwise, have sent a clear message not only to IS, but also to Obama: “Keep Taiwan out of your fight.”
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS