The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is again softening its attitude toward the much-maligned capital gains tax on securities investments, so KMT officials and lawmakers are looking for another excuse to explain their policy flip-flops over the tax.
This time, the concession came from the KMT caucus, which on Friday announced that the removal of the capital gains tax was the “direction” it would be taking, saying that the levy was already part of the securities transaction tax.
If the KMT caucus’ decision passes another round of cross-caucus negotiation today and wins support from opposition party legislators in coming days, it would represent the fifth adjustment to the tax in three years, while returning the capital gains tax policy to where it was in 2012.
For all the arguments that supporters and foes of the tax have made, the key issue is that the tax ensures the principles of social justice and fairness.
A well-designed tax scheme on securities investments should also promote healthy development in capital markets while discouraging speculation.
However, the local stock market is still reeling from the government’s decision to resume the capital gains tax three years ago: A widely expected annual tax revenue of NT$6 billion to NT$11 billion (US$182.33 million to US$334.27 million) from the capital gains tax has not materialized, while total capitalization of the local stock market has shrunk by NT$3 trillion in the past three years and revenue from the securities transaction tax was cut by NT$24.8 billion per year on average due to dwindling turnover.
Several Cabinet officials have voiced their support for abolishing the tax, saying it would alleviate tax burdens on stock investors and help revitalize a listless market. Stock investors have the right to expect something back from the market, but they have been rewarded with much lower returns than China and Hong Kong in recent years.
However, arguments by KMT officials and lawmakers are weak — the regulatory pendulum should not be allowed to swing back and forth when under pressure. Rather, the KMT aims to abolish this tax ahead of January’s presidential and legislative elections in a bid to win votes.
The fiasco over the capital gains tax resembles the situations faced by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration in pushing for other reforms, ranging from the adjustment of fuel and electricity rates to the pension system overhaul to the fair distribution of wealth, in which the government’s hastiness in pushing through its policy objectives only resulted in serious objections from the public, with the final policies being watered down to a symbolic gesture of promises made by Ma when he came to power in 2008.
A wrong policy is far worse than corruption. However, who made the capital gains tax a bad policy and how has the issue degenerated into a brawl in the legislature?
The path to reform is endless, but along the way, greater space for discussion is necessary to reach a consensus, and a thorough consideration of potential impacts is the key to a successful execution of such reforms.
The pandemonium surrounding the capital gains tax is a case of irresponsible policymaking and careless leadership.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS