Last year, it was South Korea. Now, it is Japan.
Yes, nation-bashing is now, apparently, a winning campaign strategy. At least for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
And this disturbing trend is showing no signs of abating.
Remarks made on Saturday by KMT presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) that “Taiwan will lose to Japan” if she does not win next year’s election reflect the latest in a set of statements that are likely to cause some head-scratching in both Taipei and Tokyo.
After all, is Japan not Taiwan’s second-largest trading partner? Is Japan not a key influence in Taiwan’s geostrategic position? Did President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) not recently say that Taiwan and Japan enjoy a “special partnership”?
So where is all this negativity coming from?
The answer is simple.
It reflects the KMT’s willingness to place politics above all else — even above the importance of Taiwan-Japan relations. More fundamentally, it shows that the KMT is not above expending what is in the nation’s best interests — having a strong, healthy relationship with Japan — in order to advance its own political agenda.
The implications of this trend feeds into a common criticism that in Taiwan, politics trumps all.
It sends a detrimental message to our important allies that anything and everything can be sacrificed and expended in the course of an election. That is not a message Taiwan can afford to be sending as it seeks to strengthen global relations.
Taiwan’s position in world order is premised on maintaining strong international relations. It is the foundation of what keeps Taiwan free and secure; and it is essential as to diversifying the economy.
This is the foundation of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) foreign policy direction: That Taiwan should be building better and more engaging partnerships with global partners. It should be looking to find new opportunities to strengthen — not weaken — these relations.
That was the message DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) shared when she visited the US in June. It has also been Taiwan’s consistent message to the international community as well. This is a message that will not change based on the whims of an election campaign.
As for history?
History did not stop the US and Japan from building one of the strongest and most enduring alliances of the 20th century, and it certainly would not stop Taiwan from forging a vital and dynamic partnership with Japan.
Vincent Y. Chao is a deputy director of international affairs for the Democratic Progressive Party.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS