Last year, it was South Korea. Now, it is Japan.
Yes, nation-bashing is now, apparently, a winning campaign strategy. At least for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
And this disturbing trend is showing no signs of abating.
Remarks made on Saturday by KMT presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) that “Taiwan will lose to Japan” if she does not win next year’s election reflect the latest in a set of statements that are likely to cause some head-scratching in both Taipei and Tokyo.
After all, is Japan not Taiwan’s second-largest trading partner? Is Japan not a key influence in Taiwan’s geostrategic position? Did President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) not recently say that Taiwan and Japan enjoy a “special partnership”?
So where is all this negativity coming from?
The answer is simple.
It reflects the KMT’s willingness to place politics above all else — even above the importance of Taiwan-Japan relations. More fundamentally, it shows that the KMT is not above expending what is in the nation’s best interests — having a strong, healthy relationship with Japan — in order to advance its own political agenda.
The implications of this trend feeds into a common criticism that in Taiwan, politics trumps all.
It sends a detrimental message to our important allies that anything and everything can be sacrificed and expended in the course of an election. That is not a message Taiwan can afford to be sending as it seeks to strengthen global relations.
Taiwan’s position in world order is premised on maintaining strong international relations. It is the foundation of what keeps Taiwan free and secure; and it is essential as to diversifying the economy.
This is the foundation of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) foreign policy direction: That Taiwan should be building better and more engaging partnerships with global partners. It should be looking to find new opportunities to strengthen — not weaken — these relations.
That was the message DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) shared when she visited the US in June. It has also been Taiwan’s consistent message to the international community as well. This is a message that will not change based on the whims of an election campaign.
As for history?
History did not stop the US and Japan from building one of the strongest and most enduring alliances of the 20th century, and it certainly would not stop Taiwan from forging a vital and dynamic partnership with Japan.
Vincent Y. Chao is a deputy director of international affairs for the Democratic Progressive Party.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS