Open letter on education
On Sunday, the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) — a Taiwanese-American grassroots organization with 54 chapters across the US — expressed its deep concerns about the handling of the student protests against amendments of history textbooks by the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
The problem stems from the fact that during the past two years, Ma’s administration has been preparing changes to the curriculum guidelines that turn the clock back to the days of the repressive Martial Law period (1949-1987), when the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — which came over from China in 1949 — imposed its version of history on the people of Taiwan, emphasizing a Sino-centric view, and glorifying the Chinese Nationalist perspective.
After Taiwan’s momentous transition to democracy in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the governments of presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were able to bring about a change to a more Taiwan-centric perspective, emphasizing Taiwan’s own rich history, geography and culture. The amendments currently being proposed and implemented by the Ma administration are designed to shift the focus back to an anachronistic perspective based on the outdated worldview of the KMT old-guard ideologues and whitewashing the authoritarian period.
During the past few months there has been an increasing groundswell of protests against the proposed amendments — which presumably went into effect on Saturday. Teachers of history, as well as students at high schools and universities, have voiced strong opposition against the changes and have urged the Ministry of Education to rescind the proposed amendments. To no avail: The ministry has persisted in moving forward.
After a series of fruitless meetings between ministry officials and leaders of student organizations, a number of high-school activists briefly occupied the ministry on July 23. As a result, 33 people were arrested and detained for a day, including 20-year-old student leader Dai Lin (林冠華). On Thursday, Lin tragically committed suicide in protest against the lack of responsiveness and harsh treatment they received.
As an overseas organization of Taiwanese-Americans we fully support the student protests. The young generations in Taiwan — along with all the people in Taiwan — have a right to an unvarnished history that presents the facts. The country needs to get away from the biased and self-serving accounts of a repressive KMT regime. Taiwan can be proud of its rich and multi-cultured history. The young protesters are right to stand up to this imposition of a false and flawed account of the course of history.
FAPA urges the government of President Ma Ying-jeou to:
‧ immediately rescind the proposed changes, drop any legal charges against arrested students and take responsibility for the death of Lin;
‧ establish a truly bipartisan group of experts in the field of history and allow them to draw factual outlines for history texts;
‧ in the meantime, continue the use of current textbooks without making use of any of the proposed amendments.
Formosan Association for Public Affairs
Washington
Re-engineering history
When I came to China from the UK many years ago, I was horribly ignorant of the history of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, as well as surrounding countries.
I am glad I have learned it as an adult, rather than as an innocent child. In that way, I can use my critical thinking powers and hopefully reach a better judgement than I would have been able to do in school.
History as a subject needs to be re-engineered. When we have the “revisionists,” the slanted nationalistic curricula, the “lies by omission” and the politically incorrect substance, then that is a sad reflection of the state of “education” — in most countries, I fear.
Howard Huxter
China
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press