The Taipei High Administrative Court ruled against the Ministry of Education in a case involving its curriculum guidelines committee — which recommended controversial adjustments to the high-school social studies curriculum — for failing to release the names of committee members. However, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is ignoring the court’s ruling and pushing ahead with the changes.
Deputy Legislative Speaker and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential hopeful Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) on Thursday last week in a radio interview said that the high-school history curriculum underwent comprehensive changes during the administrations of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), and the names of those curriculum committee members were not made public.
“We are simply returning [the curriculum] to the right track,” she said, adding that the curriculum can contain differing narratives, so long as it conforms to the basic principles of diversity, tolerance and respect, as laid out in the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution.
Using the Constitution to justify the ministry’s self-labeled “minor adjustments” to the curriculum shows Hung has absolutely no understanding of the document.
Convention dictates that the high-school curriculum be revised every six years. During Lee and Chen’s administrations the curriculum was revised in a transparent manner and the proposed changes were put before the electorate. The Ma administration changed the curriculum again in 2012. Although the pan-green camp was unhappy with the changes, the revisions did not go so far as to completely distort history.
The curriculum was not due to be revised again until 2018, yet Ma is attempting to rush a radical overhaul before leaving office.
If the Ma administration wanted to completely overhaul the curriculum, why did it not do so in 2012? The answer is that in 2012 Ma needed to pull the wool over the eyes of the electorate so that he would stand a chance of being re-elected for a second term. He did not dare force any radical changes.
Now that he now longer faces electoral pressure, this problem no longer exists. Thus, even the most extreme policies are currently being pushed through government.
Without that pressure, Ma will be even more inclined to force through the most outrageous of policies. More frightening still is that next year there will be a four-month transition period between the Jan. 16 presidential election and the inauguration of the next president on May 20.
If Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) wins the January election, Ma has time to invoke his presidential powers to bring Taiwan to a complete standstill.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) opposed the merging of next year’s presidential and legislative elections. However, due to a number of DPP legislators wanting to capitalize on the “Tsai effect” to improve their re-election chances, the DPP did not support the TSU’s initiative.
Concerned that Ma would use the four-month transition period to inflict serious damage on Taiwan, the TSU proposed a bill to regulate the handover of the presidency, setting out rules and responsibilities for the outgoing and incoming presidents. It would have prevented an outgoing president from carrying out subversive activities detrimental to the nation.
Unfortunately, the KMT killed it off after DPP legislators chose not to lend their support, because they were worried about the January elections. They might live to regret their actions.
Chen Mao-hsiung is an adjunct professor at National Sun Yat-sen University and chairman of the Society for the Promotion of Taiwanese Security.
Translated by Edward Jones
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS