Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) earlier this month visited Washington. As a young Taiwanese studying in the US, I was fortunate to participate in some of the public events during her visit, and able to observe the interactions with friends of the presidential candidate in the US.
In her speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the first thing Tsai discussed was democracy and freedom in Taiwan today as the result of a long and hard struggle against authoritarian rule. She said this is a treasure. US Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen later reminded us: History shows that “freedom is not free.”
Tsai gave a detailed presentation on the challenges facing Taiwan, such as stagnated economic growth, social injustice, and foreign policy. She gave a concise and in-depth picture. This approach shows that she cares for Taiwan and knows the issues. Some reporters from Taiwan and China attempted to trick Tsai into making statements about the so-called “1992 consensus” or her definition of the “status quo.” However, she referred them back to her speech.
Afterward, Heritage Foundation Asian Studies Center director Walter Lohman said that what matters is not the precise formulations used, but the overall approach that she outlined in her speech. He said that the main message Tsai delivered to Washington was, “You can trust me,” and he added that he trusted her.
What counts is that the nation’s future and the quality of society. These are the most important considerations for Tsai.
Thus, rather than nitpicking over the meaning of different terms, it is important to hear Tsai’s views and learn about her vision for Taiwan. The nation needs time to rejuvenate, to heal and improve.
I also attended the congressional reception and I was impressed by the warm and personal welcome she received from nearly two dozen US lawmakers, including US Representative Ed Royce and Ros-Lehtinen. They reaffirmed the value of Taiwan to the world and reassured Tsai that they would stand with Taiwanese to secure democracy and freedom.
They also praised Tsai’s courage and leadership, her confidence and her ablilty to attract Washington’s attention. The US Congress helped Taiwan make the transition to democracy; many of its members have fought for Taiwan’s interests and international relations for decades.
Formosan Association for Public Affairs president Mark Kao (高龍榮) expressed his appreciation to Congress for its help: “Then and now, you [the US Congress] have given the people of Taiwan hope that they never walk alone even in the darkest night.”
The Taiwanese-American community also welcomed Tsai with a banquet in her honor, attended by hundreds of Taiwanese-Americans from the east coast.
Tsai shared with them some stories from home; telling them about the new political landscape and that all Taiwanese can work together for a better future for the nation.
Seeing Tsai in Washington has given me new hope that we are moving toward a bright future: A future in which freedom and democracy are essential ingredients of society. A future where people work together for a better economy that benefits people at all levels of the economic ladder. A future in which Taiwan is respected internationally as a democratic nation. And a future where the people can trust the government.
Chia-yen Lin is a graduate student in public affairs at Indiana University of Pennsylvania, and an intern at the Formosan Association for Public Affairs in Washington.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS