Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is facing her biggest test on the road toward the presidency. The US is Taiwan’s most important ally, and in a bid to avoid a repetition of what happened during her visit to the US four years ago, when her Taiwan Consensus failed to woo her hosts, she is now attempting to win international recognition of her policy to maintain the cross-strait “status quo.”
Washington is not the only challenge facing Tsai. In Taiwan, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) must have been feeling lonely, so while Tsai is visiting Washington, he has hosted a video conference with Stanford University. During the conference, Ma said Tsai’s “status quo” lacks substance. He instead pushed his own China policies and the so-called “1992 consensus.” In doing so, he probably forgot that last year’s Sunflower movement was a protest against his China policies that pushed his approval ratings down below 10 percent.
Not only is Ma stabbing Tsai in the back during her US visit, he has also arranged a transit visit to the US to “clean up” after Tsai when he visits Central and South America. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) morale is at an all-time low and the party’s failure to put forward a candidate for next year’s presidential election is forcing Ma to fight the election battle as if he had returned to the 2012 presidential campaign.
China has not been idle either. On Tuesday, Chinese ambassador to the US Cui Tiankai (崔天凱) criticized Tsai, saying she needs to pass the test of 1.3 billion Chinese and accept the “one China” principle rather than try to muddle through the presidential election without a clear message. On Wednesday, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) said that its stance on the DPP remained clear and would not change, namely that “opposition to Taiwanese independence and insistence on the 1992 consensus is the foundation of peaceful cross-strait development.”
China clearly has not learned its lesson. During past Taiwanese presidential elections, China has tried to influence the elections with propaganda and military threats; both the missiles it fired over Taiwan in 1996 or the verbal threats issued by then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and then-premier Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基) had the opposite effect of what was intended. The Taiwanese impression of China is not good, and the statement by Cui was not helpful.
Cui misspoke. Regardless of how one looks at it, there are two separate governments in Taiwan and China. Taiwan’s presidential election is a matter for Taiwanese voters, so why should Tsai be tested by Chinese? China’s president has not passed the democratic test and been elected by 1.3 billion Chinese voters, so China has no right to comment on Taiwan’s democratic presidential elections.
The US visit is a pressure-cooker experience for Tsai. Whether various circles in the US agree with Tsai’s ideas for running the country is not an absolute factor when considering her election prospects. It will perhaps not increase her prospects of winning the election, but she must make sure it does not detract from them.
While China’s interference may have been unexpected, it is undeniably positive. Taiwan is likely to have to wait before seeing any positive effects of Tsai’s visit, but it is only by first allaying international concerns that she can focus on the presidential election campaign at home.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS