A Taipei court ruling on Wednesday ordering Nantou County Fire Department officials to pay compensation for the 2011 death of a hiker has stirred outrage. It is the first time that government rescue workers have been found liable in such a case. Most of the criticism is of the blame-the-victim mentality because Chang Po-wei (張博崴) decided to climb Baigushan (白姑大山) on his own after plans to go with a friend fell through. That outrage might be misplaced.
The seven-week search for Chang involved hundreds of people — officials, volunteers and some rescuers hired by the family. While Chang’s family sued the Nantou County police and fire departments, other police units, the National Fire Agency and a Forestry Bureau office, the court exonerated all but the fire department. The county fire department has vowed to appeal, saying the ruling was detrimental to society. However, it is more detrimental not to have the best-equipped and best-trained police, fire and rescue units possible.
The family said precious time was lost because the authorities initially refused to access Chang’s cellphone GPS data due to privacy concerns. Police and fire department teams also restricted their search to mountain trails because their ropes were not long enough to go down into the valleys, even though Chang’s girlfriend said she heard running water during a phone call he made the day after he began his trek, when he said he was lost.
Chang’s body was found by mountain climbers hired by his family — two days after they began the search — who climbed down 600m into a valley tracking water sounds. A medical examiner said Chang died five or six days before he was found. Understandably his family feels he might have been saved. Chang’s case is not the first — and sadly is unlikely to be the last — for which police, fire department and military teams have proven to be ill-equipped or ill-trained.
In June 1995, a fire gutted the top three floors of Taipei’s Grand Hotel, despite a response by hundreds of firefighters, because their extension ladders were not long enough to reach the roof, the water pressure on site was too low and military and police helicopters did not have firefighting apparatus.
In the Pachang Creek (八掌溪) tragedy in July 2000, Chiayi Fire Department personnel had never used key rescue equipment because the instructions were in Japanese, while the military wasted time squabbling over whose responsibility it would be to order helicopters deployed. The four workers trapped by a flash flood clung to each other for more than two hours awaiting rescue that never came.
On Jan. 15, 2013, a Hsinchu County man burned to death because the township’s fire department’s aerial ladder truck was too wide for the lane to his building, its aluminum ladders were not long enough and firefighters did not have an inflatable mattresses so that the man might jump to safety.
And those are just three of the more well-publicized incidents where equipment deficiencies proved crucial. Accidents happen and sometimes rescues fail even when respondents are fully equipped and trained, but we should be asking what could be learned from such incidents and take steps to improve the situation.
The Chang family has been trying to do that. In February 2012, the National Communications Commission passed an amendment to regulations for administration on satellite communication services (衛星通信業務管理規則) to allow telecom carriers to offer satellite communication services on behalf of foreign operators. The amendment was proposed by Chang’s mother so that it would be easier for mountain climbers to use satellite phones — and for rescuers to locate them.
Chang’s death is a reminder to think twice about hiking alone, but authorities should be addressing what can be done to improve Taiwan’s rescue services.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS