Before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reported to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the KMT would not announce its candidate for next year’s Republic of China (ROC) presidential election. Was this why Chu had to meet with Xi?
Chu, who serves concurrently as the mayor of New Taipei City, visited China in his capacity as KMT chairman. The party’s politicians often like to mention the so-called “1992 consensus,” but a KMT chairman serving concurrently as president would not be able to visit China. As for the party’s stance that there is “one China, with each side making its own interpretation,” Taiwanese can only ask what that interpretation really means. The KMT itself does not seem to know.
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is exactly what it is. What about the ROC? Exactly what is it? When Chu met with Xi, the KMT chairman did not dare go any further than mentioning that Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) launched a revolution against the Qing Dynasty and established the ROC. Did he dare mention the ROC to Xi’s face after it went into exile in Taiwan in 1949 following a second revolution? Of course not. KMT politicians only dare to talk about the ROC at home. They are a bunch of disgraceful political clowns constantly embarrassing themselves.
If Xi hopes that Chu will run for president, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might try to create favorable conditions for him. They might even sacrifice President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). It could order a Taiwanese businessperson — perhaps a heavyweight capitalist — to provide evidence of wrongdoing to destroy Ma’s clean image. Perhaps that would help draw a line between the KMT and Ma, and create a new image for the party to allow it to continue to deceive Taiwanese.
Taiwanese can only wonder whether the CCP sees the KMT as its tamed political representative in Taiwan. The KMT government fled to Taiwan, where it has behaved whichever way it wanted under the ROC banner. The party has transformed itself from being anticommunist to moving closer to the CCP, working together with it and attaching itself to it and it will eventually surrender to it. On the surface, the KMT praises the two Chiangs — Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — at every turn, but it discarded them somewhere in a dark corner long ago. As the era of Ma edges closer to collapse, the party is now under the leadership of Chu, a mere local government head.
Look at the people who visit China for political or business reasons: They will say anything that serves their interests. It seems that the KMT has lost its party spirit, and feels more comfortable in China than in Taiwan.
If the PRC is so unhappy that the ROC remains in exile in Taiwan, it is welcome to take the ROC back and perhaps establish a historical and cultural park to shelter it, and let Taiwan be Taiwan instead of the ROC. That would be the perfect solution. Why should China bother manipulating Taiwan’s presidential election?
Taiwanese have awakened and do not favor the KMT. Flying the ROC banner, this vicious political force is trying hard to become the CCP’s representative. The “1992 consensus” does not really exist, and it really only means “one China” without any room for any interpretations of what that “one China” might be. Taiwanese have long since understood that the KMT continues to follow closely in the CCP’s footsteps, not daring to deviate from the path.
As for those with loftier aspirations, they should show the KMT and the CCP how it is done in next year’s presidential election.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS