During his trip to China, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) met with representatives of Taiwanese businesses in China at a forum in Shanghai on Sunday. One of these representatives, Susan Tung (董淑貞), president of a UK-registered company based in China, told the forum that it was time for the KMT to focus on cooperation with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and that Taiwan would not stand a chance if Chu were to listen to “other voices in Taiwan.”
Tung added that there are more than 350,000 Taiwanese-Chinese couples and, if family members were included, that figure could easily reach more than 1 million people who could return to Taiwan to vote. With this army of voters, “how could the KMT not win?” Tung asked.
Tung heads Tung Global Financial Trading UK. She did not hold back in her speech, revealing how the interests of Taiwanese businesses in China are intimately tied to Beijing. She has become a vanguard for her peers, preoccupied with how politics could be brought to bear to protect China, with precious little regard for democratic principles or the interests of other Taiwanese. She has no problem exploiting cross-strait marriages as an intimidation tactic to influence the presidential election to maintain her economic interests in China. Her unambiguous comments were met with some alarm in Taiwan.
Even more alarming is that Tung is vice president of the worldwide Friends of Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) Association, a member of the Overseas Community Affairs Council and the World League for Freedom and Democracy. She is also an overseas executive member of the CCP’s United Front Work Department and the overseas representative of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference of Jiangxi Province. Her wide-ranging and complex roster of positions have been criticized by Taiwanese media, which have questioned where her loyalties ultimately lie: with China, Taiwan or the UK?
This form of shifting loyalties among overseas Taiwanese businesspeople was the subject of Scott Kastner’s book Political Conflict and Economic Interdependence Across the Taiwan Strait and Beyond. In the book, Kastner talks about how China, seeking unification, would need the support of Taiwanese “political allies,” and how China-based Taiwanese businesspeople are the best candidates for this role. While Beijing continues to reinforce its military intimidation, it is also strengthening its ties with the Taiwanese business community in China, in a pincer movement aimed at securing unification.
In previous elections, many major Taiwanese investors in China have put up money and resources to support the KMT. The triumvirate of the CCP, the KMT in Taiwan and Taiwanese businesspeople in China have become a prodigious pro-unification “united front” that not only has huge corporate capital at its disposal, but also controls large numbers of workers, and is intimately involved in providing basic essentials — including the mainstream media — in Taiwan. This has already been set into motion for the presidential election next year.
This whole affair has opened eyes in Taiwan to the problem of shifting loyalties. The public is more aware that, even though these individuals have their roots in Taiwan, they have also come under Beijing’s spell. When businesspeople become pro-unification, they do so to a degree even more extreme than the KMT government. They no longer recognize Taiwan, but have instead become “Chinese citizens.”
This incident has also drawn attention to the issue of absentee voting, together with extended voting rights for Chinese spouses. While many countries practice absentee voting, it carries with it potential political dangers that need to be looked into.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS