Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-Wen (蔡英文), the party’s presidential nominee, is reportedly planning a visit to Washington next month.
At this juncture, the Middle East and north Africa are in turmoil. Russia and China are becoming more belligerent, taking advantage of the inability of the administration of US President Barack Obama to manage numerous global hot spots.
Against this backdrop, Taiwan might not register a blip on Washington’s radar.
Swimming upstream and competing for attention, Tsai would be well advised to present a convincing case.
It must first be made unequivocally clear that the “Republic of China in Taiwan” is a farce; since Sept. 2, 1945, the year “the Japanese Instrument of Surrender” was signed on the USS Missouri, the nation has been a US Military Government-protected territory, as it remains today.
The state Taiwan is in is not of its own making; the US broke it and the US owns it.
Facing threats from a vengeful China, Taiwan’s strategic role to the US, Japan, South Korea and many Southeast Asian countries is no less important than what Israel’s is to the US and the EU.
The US has no intention of relinquishing its responsibility and power over Taiwan, as demonstrated by the landing, which was intentional, of two McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornets in Tainan on April 1. Washington plans to derive maximum interest from its position.
Taiwan, with limited cards to play, fully understands the US’ desire and will not spoil the game plan. However, as last year’s Sunflower movement demonstrated, Taiwan will never submit itself to Chinese trickery, even when Beijing seeks to exert subtle, indirect pressure.
Taiwan respects China’s view that there is only “one China.” To be more specific, Taiwan has no interest in the issue of “multiple Chinas,” long considered a linguistic fight between Beijing’s oligarchy and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) taking refuge in Taipei. The discussion over areas that use “China” in their titles is of no interest to Taiwan, which cares about one issue: There is but one Taiwan.
The notion that the DPP has the capability to provide people in Taiwan with more scope for choice belongs in the garbage can. The nation’s position is not that of choosing from a restaurant menu. It has a single agenda: Never be a part of China.
Some academic circles in Taiwan floated the idea of “Taiwanese neutrality.” It is naive to entertain such a foolish caprice. Neutrality requires a robust national defense that can deter an invader at its first thought of crossing the border. Such a defense demands that every adult be willing and able to use a weapon. Taiwanese are nowhere near fulfilling that requirement.
Taiwan, whose shape is somewhat like an aircraft carrier, has been guarding the western Pacific for the past 70 years and it will remain in the position for a long time to come.
What this implies has not gone unnoticed. A day prior to his speech on April 29 to a joint session of the US Congress, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced, with Obama, a renewed set of joint military defense guidelines that put Taiwan and its surrounding waters squarely in the crosshairs.
Meanwhile, China is muddying the water in the South China Sea, with dredging around the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島), which Taiwan also claims, and building a landing strip. The actions are intimidatory to all nearby countries and openly challenges freedom of movement in busy sea lanes.
Given escalating temperatures in the region, the existence of Taiwan on the side of freedom accentuates its role to serve the interests of many parties.
On behalf of Taiwanese, Tsai must hold her head high while in Washington.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the US Taiwan Public Policy Council.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS