The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has to endure the ignominy of being simultaneously watched over by the US and confined by China. The US likes to keep a close eye on Taiwan, because although Japan renounced Taiwan as a colonial territory, under the terms of the US-directed San Francisco Peace Treaty — which entered into force in 1952 and officially ended World War II in the Asia-Pacific region — Taiwan was not reassigned to any other nation. The US’ Taiwan Relations Act also contains relevant clauses, while China’s continued persistence in its claim of sovereignty over the ROC squatters on Taiwan means that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has yet to break free from China’s spell.
The US of course acts in its own national interests, so when it established diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), it acknowledged — but did not recognize — China’s claim of sovereignty over Taiwan. Peace and stability in East Asia is important to the US.
Although China has been unable to alter US policy on Taiwan, Beijing concentrates all its efforts on the KMT, which no longer possesses absolute control over Taiwan. The KMT, which still seeks to retain power through the electoral process, is trying very hard to deceive the public, but a succession of former KMT officials and politicians have unscrupulously prostrated themselves at the feet of China. The KMT sees Taiwan as its personal possession to be traded off; Taiwanese should not allow them to divest Taiwan of its power. The stage on which the KMT operates is also a sacrificial altar: They are two sides of the same coin.
The public has high hopes that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) can build a new and independent Taiwan. The KMT, masquerading as China, colonized Taiwan and is bent on creating a one-party state. The two main political parties are extremely important to determining the development of Taiwan as a fully fledged state. Next year’s presidential election is set to be a decisive battle: If the DPP wins, the nation would move in a more Taiwan-centered direction, whereas if the KMT wins, the nation would continue to move in the opposite direction.
However, the threat of China’s containment and US nannying often causes the discourse and strategies of the main parties to become confused. The KMT is especially apt to stir up trouble and blur the issues where the DPP’s policies differ from its own. In particular, some DPP politicos, harboring ulterior motives, love to make irresponsible remarks, revealing a KMT-like propensity to switch political positions with chameleon-like ease. The high proportion of Taiwanese who acknowledge Taiwan is a separate nation from China are left confused; and those who wish Taiwan to gain de jure independence from China are left feeling frustrated.
DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) policy of maintaining the so-called “status quo” is established on the premise of Taiwan as a “sovereign and independent nation, its current name being the Republic of China.” In sticking to the KMT’s previously amended “bottom line,” Tsai is seeking to reduce the threat of external interference in next year’s legislative election. What is more important is that these conservative values are both innovative and progressive.
Aside from any future full de jure independence from China, this will enable the DPP to provide what a great number of Taiwanese long for: To belong to a normal nation. Taiwanese, in their support for the DPP — and Tsai as its presidential candidate — must unite behind the party and make the US and China acknowledge Taiwan’s basic right to self-determination.
Lee Min-yung is a poet and political commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS