The administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has denigrated itself once again by jumping on the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) bandwagon. This has led to intense public concern.
Why does the Ma government lack meticulousness and why is it being so hasty to join the AIIB? The answer is simple: Ma’s administration regards China as an economic outlet for Taiwan. This type of flawed thinking will lead the government’s China policy increasingly down a road of no return, seriously damaging Taiwan’s interests.
The Ma administration believes that joining the AIIB is supportive to Taiwan’s attempts to gain business opportunities from China’s “One Belt, One Road” project. However, many major countries have announced an interest in joining the AIIB, and they all have their reasons for doing so. After years of pro-China policies, the Ma administration inevitably feels it should obtain special privileges from the Chinese authorities.
However, someone needs to pour a bucket of cold water over the heads of the Ma administration and get them to wake up from their hot-headed pro-China policy. This bucket of cold water comes after nearly 30 years of cross-strait economic interaction, which initially gave Taiwanese businesses an advantage, but today has transformed into a relationship in which China has much more leverage and Taiwanese firms hold out their begging bowl to Beijing.
The same can be said about the relationship between the Ma administration and China. In reality, the reason Ma’s China policy has failed can be attributed to two misconceptions. First, the pro-China stance has been treated as participation in the international community and integration with the global network. Taiwan’s trade-based economy and relatively small domestic market are the reasons the nation must connect with overseas markets to grow its economy and participate with the international community.
Unfortunately, the Ma government is blinded by ideology and has shifted the focus of international participation toward integration with China to grasp emerging opportunities and avoid marginalization. This is a serious distortion. The truth is that Taiwan’s participation in China’s economy — be it in terms of investment, manpower, technology or trade — has always been excessive, which has resulted in a “periphery versus core” relationship and Taiwan’s longstanding marginalization.
Second, whether in the domestic or the international market, China is already Taiwan’s strongest competitor. China no longer needs Taiwanese investments. Beijing’s main policy goals are to foster the growth of its local industry.
Over the past 20 or 30 years, Taiwanese businesspeople participated in China’s economic development, forming two types of business: original equipment manufacturers (OEM) — which are focused on exports — and Taiwanese businesses building on the demand of the Chinese market. The first type gave extended life to many businesses that left Taiwan, primarily technology companies. The latter included a few outstanding companies that dominated particular markets in China.
However, the successes of these two types of businesses have only been beneficial to the individual business owners and their respective shareholders, and the repercussions for Taiwan have been economic stagnation.
Even worse, the current fate of Taiwanese businesses in China is similar to previous events, in that after Taiwanese companies help others to become dominant, Taiwanese are cast aside as irrelevant or useless. Taiwanese OEMs face asymmetrical competition that includes the cancellation of tax incentives and increased salaries in China, while Chinese companies get policy and resource assistance from the government.
In particular, China promotes the technology industry — such as the semiconductor sector — in which they have not only injected capital funds, but also intervened more openly using state power to coerce well known foreign companies into joint ventures with local firms and even transfer patents, using anti-trust policies as an excuse. The semiconductor industry is the most important foundation to Taiwanese industry, but it is being overtaken by China. Taiwan’s technology industry will soon hit a dead end.
In addition, as China puts resources into solar energy and other sectors such as LEDs, not only will it create excess production and cause prices to collapse, but Taiwanese companies will also be sacrificed as a result of anti-dumping penalties in other countries.
The same scenario is playing out in industries focused on domestic markets. Once Chinese firms establish economies of scale, even Taiwanese firms that gained early opportunities and grabbed a large market share will be unable to stand up to strong competition from the newer Chinese companies.
The scary thing is that these economic changes mirror the changes of the political situation in the Taiwan Strait. With regard to the AIIB, former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) received a cool reception from Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) when he expressed Taiwan’s willingness to join the bank at the Boao Forum for Asia in the southern Chinese province of Hainan, essentially reducing the meeting to a handshaking ceremony.
However, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office has accepted Taiwan’s application, with the Chinese media highly critical of the matter, repeatedly making it clear that once Taiwan has lost its independent economic position and political power will in turn be hijacked.
The Ma administration must understand one thing: China is now Taiwan’s economic competitor, not its partner. Yet Taiwanese business operations in China, regardless of whether they are a manufacturing base or a market, have all run into trouble, gradually losing competitiveness and market advantage. China does more harm than good to Taiwan’s economy.
Thus, joining the AIIB is not a fundamentally important issue for the nation. Taiwan’s most urgent goal is still to fend off China’s restrictions, to actively develop international markets, join the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and open up to the rest of the world. This is the only road to sustainability for Taiwan.
Translated by Zane Kheir
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS