In his will, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) expressed the hope that his spirit would always be with his “comrades and compatriots” — these last words sound creepy to a lot of people.
Chiang’s followers and their own followers in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have not followed his words and they have abandoned his anti-communist spirit — all they do is insist that Taiwanese students and the Taiwanese public always be surrounded by his cold bronze statues.
Placing statues of someone everywhere and promoting individual worship is a fascist trick, and it runs counter to the values of a democratic country.
Has anyone who has ever gone to Washington seen a bronze statue of former US president George Washington? The largest bronze statue in Washington is that of former US president Thomas Jefferson, and the most popular one is that of US marines raising a flag on Iwo Jima during World War II.
Since many people think that Chiang should be held responsible for the 228 Massacre, many of the statues of Chiang that are to be found in every corner of Taiwan were spray-painted by protesters on the eve of 228 Memorial Day last month.
Surprisingly, some KMT members claimed that without Chiang, Taiwan would long ago have fallen under Beijing’s rule and become part of China. However, if the standard for deciding who should be honored with a statue is to be based on a person’s contribution to the maintenance of Taiwan’s independence, Chiang is not the greatest contributor, and there are many other people who must not be forgotten.
First, North Korea’s rookie leader Kim Jong-un’s grandfather, Kim Il-sung, contributed to Taiwan’s independence the most. After Kim launched a war against South Korea, then-US president Harry Truman, who had first chosen not to involve the US, decided to send the US Seventh Fleet to the Taiwan Strait.
Second, former US secretary of state John Foster Dulles’ grandfather, John Foster, who also served as secretary of state, deserves a statue. After Foster left his post, he was hired by the Qing Dynasty as a diplomatic consultant, assisting Chinese official Li Hongzhang (李鴻章) in the negotiations of the Treaty of Shimonoseki with Japan. Eventually, China ceded Taiwan and Penghu to Japan, severing the ties between the Qing empire and Taiwan and Penghu.
Third, years after Foster’s involvement in China’s cession of Taiwan and Penghu to Japan, Dulles dominated the signing of the peace treaty with Japan, also known as the Treaty of San Francisco, which was signed between the Allied powers and Japan.
He was strongly opposed to the British suggestion that Taiwan and Penghu be returned to China, which is why the treaty merely states that “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores,” leaving the status of Taiwan and Penghu undecided. In addition, he also prohibited Chiang from launching a counterattack against Japan and thus helped maintain the “status quo,” according to which Taiwan is not a part of China.
Chiang’s followers should stop talking nonsense and humiliating him. They should be satisfied to always be surrounded by his spirit, instead of statues of him, and they should eliminate the last vestiges of fascist rule and the nightmares of the Taiwanese people.
In democratic Taiwan, a diversity of statues is needed for us to commemorate outstanding talent in all domains nurtured by this land. This would make Taiwan both more truthful and better.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS