China has unilaterally created a new flight route, M503, along the Taiwan Strait median line, originally due to come into effect today. Amid rigorous objections by the ruling and opposition parties in Taiwan, and protests by civic groups on Sunday, Taiwan and China reached a consensus to postpone the implementation of the new route, to use it on a trial basis and to maintain communication about progress.
Although the controversy has been set aside for the time being, the situation remains tense and Taiwan must remain vigilant.
In response to the strength of the reaction in Taiwan, Chinese officials initially proposed moving the new route 4 nautical miles (7.4km) west — an idea rejected by Taiwan. China subsequently agreed to move the flight path 6 nautical miles to the west, which the government found acceptable.
However, the opposition still has serious reservations about the route’s implications for national security, concerned that after it is implemented, the ability of the air force to protect the nation will be compromised. Even if China is willing to move the line 6 nautical miles to the west, given the speed of flights these days, that distance will be covered in a matter of seconds, and the air force does not have enough tactical space for interception. Should Chinese fighter jets fly along that line, then suddenly fly east, interception time and ability will have been dramatically reduced.
China has said that M503 will only be used by civilian flights, for peaceful uses; that fighter jets will not use the route and planes will only fly in one direction. However, past experience tells us there is cause for alarm.
When China reacted badly to the “special state-to-state relations” (兩國論), it sent fighter jets along civilian air routes and, with the M503 route so close to the Taiwan Strait median line, Beijing’s motivation for the new route gives rise for concern.
Perhaps the most worrying aspect of this is how China unilaterally announced the new routes without official cross-strait talks beforehand, demonstrating precious little respect for Taiwan. Had Taiwanese authorities not raised concerns, Beijing would have just implemented the route.
Even if China is willing to postpone the route’s implementation, or move it 6 nautical miles to the west, these are piecemeal concessions. If Taiwan softens its approach, the new route will encroach on the median line and the nation will have to brace itself for possible future skirmishes in which its security measures might prove inadequate.
The rise of China’s military strength is an uncontested fact. In spite of China’s insistence that its rise is a peaceful one, neighboring countries — South Korea and Japan to the north and Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and India to the south — are making preparations to protect themselves. Many of China’s actions are clearly targeted and all countries in the region feel intimidated by what it is doing. Neighboring countries are on high alert, with regional tensions gradually being ratcheted up.
China is simply too big and everything it does is being watched. Everything it does, irrespective of its intentions or volition, will make the countries surrounding it anxious.
However, if China wants these countries to rest easy, it could simply achieve this by not doing anything to arouse suspicion. Instead of thrusting its intentions on others, giving them no choice but to accept, it needs to be completely transparent, informing any countries involved in advance.
If it had taken this approach with the new air route, or with recent events in the East China Sea and the South China Sea, the international community would be gradually accepting China as a superpower that can be trusted.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS