A grave danger threatening national security is lurking. A critical time is approaching and abundant precursors warrant the concern. Make no mistake, the worries are not hatched from thin air.
What are these ominous signs?
The Hualien County commissioner announced that in the middle of next month, direct commercial flights between Hualien Airport and several Chinese cities would begin.
With that, a nightmarish air defense hole will be opened wide. Disguised as a commercial airliner, a Chinese military plane could easily land 200 fully equipped special operations personnel per aircraft after a flight time of less than 30 minutes. Within two hours and with half a dozen planes, a whole battalion could commandeer the airport and control the nation’s northeastern air space. Chiashan Air Base, a facility dug into a nearby mountain, would be rendered inoperable. With a lightning-quick strike, China could deny US or Japanese intervention from Guam and Okinawa.
Even more worrisome, Chinese visitors are flooding to Taiwan. Last year alone, more than 1 million were roaming the nation with almost no restrictions. Some of the visitors are believed to be saboteurs — highly trained People’s Liberation Army members. Even if the number is less than 1 percent, the potential damage they could do is horrifying. The agents, when the time comes, could mercilessly slaughter local leaders.
In the past few years, classified information about the nation’s weapon depots has most likely been compromised. In addition, a significant number of businesspeople and politicians are willing to trade Taiwan’s security for financial gain. Some retired high-ranking military officers have openly committed treason in word and deed by siding with Beijing on ceremonial occasions. Worse yet, such traitorous acts seem to be sanctioned and encouraged by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). A disloyal defense does not need a subversive intrusion to fail.
Against these dark forces, civilian sectors seem utterly unprepared to defend the nation. Most Taiwanese are not trained to operate the simplest of firearms, let alone semiautomatic or fully automatic guns.
Taiwanese tend to be more docile and timid when it comes to a showdown. A lack of strong core values and, if the values arise, resolve to vehemently express and defend them is true of individuals and leaders. People who instinctively submit condemn themselves to eternal slavery. This is a lesson nobody should learn by experience.
Beside the internal factors, the international environment does not look helpful. The US has its hands full dealing with events in the Middle East, north Africa, Ukraine and North Korea. US President Barack Obama’s worldview places Taiwan at best at the bottom of his agenda.
The situation is not likely to improve next year when the Republican and Democratic parties are set to engage in a fierce fight for the White House. With such high stakes on the table, neither side would spare any time for Taiwan. Given such an attention deficiency, Beijing will certainly take any opportunity it can.
Similarly, next year, Taiwan will be in an awkward position with a new leader elected five months before the current one leaves office in May.
A weakened US, a bellicose Russia, an unpredictable North Korea, a burning Ukraine, a chaotic Middle East, a nationalistic Beijing and a Taiwan infested by hostile agents, foreign and domestic, would be a perfect storm, one that forecasters should be expecting to make landfall.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council in the US.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of