Since President MA Ying-jeou (馬英九) stepped down as chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the party and the nation are no longer governed by the same leader. Ma leads the nation, whereas the KMT’s new leader, New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫), heads the party. Ma’s practical influence is greatly reduced, and even invitations for him to appear at important events around the nation have greatly decreased. Political power has clearly shifted toward the legislature, and the man who now receives the most invitations is Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
This result should not come as a surprise. Ma abused his presidential powers to cook up a story and accuse Wang of improper lobbying in an attempt to expel him from the party, which would have entailed the loss of his position as speaker. The move met with unexpected opposition and now more than 40 KMT lawmakers and 20 members of the KMT Central Standing Committee have signed a petition asking that the lawsuit aimed at the termination of Wang’s party membership be withdrawn. How many other people in Taiwan’s political arena are capable of pulling off something like this?
Chu is a shrewd politician and is mentored by his father-in-law, former Taiwan Provincial Assembly speaker Kao Yu-jen (高育仁) — also a savvy operator. Chu knows that his political power and that of his people depends on the legislature, and that their survival relies on Wang. Hence, the withdrawal of the lawsuit against Wang is only a matter of time and methodology.
That Wang has gone from almost having his KMT membership revoked to becoming the darling of the party, and from being accused of improper lobbying to (as rumor has it) preparing to run for president while also bringing Chu into the fold, shows that Wang has managed to turn his fortunes around quite dramatically. Now he could either take another step forward and run for the presidency, or he could take a step back and retain his speakership. The formation of a coalition between Chu and Wang is the logical result.
Chu now has a firm grip on the party’s assets and the right to nominate candidates for major elections. His most important political strength resides in the legislature. Since, in his opinion, the reason the KMT failed miserably in last year’s nine-in-one local elections is that the KMT lost touch with the public, he might just as well let the legislature reflect public opinion and operate independently from Ma by using the legislature to lead Ma, instead of covering up for Ma’s corrupt administration.
Ma is inept, but he and his people have controlled Taiwan and reaped the benefits for six years. As a result, the KMT suffered a terrible defeat in the elections and the numerous misfortunes that followed. Ma’s dream of a unified Republic of China under the rule of the KMT is more improbable than a unified China under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Without the KMT chairmanship, Ma is no longer the person that Xi wants to deal with. After the elections, only one city and five counties are left under Ma’s control. His kingdom is now surrounded by cities and counties governed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The media that used to worship him are now realizing their important role in independently monitoring the government, and their capability to probe is mightier than that of the DPP.
So Ma, who now has nothing left but the title of president, has all the time in the world, and is using it to protect his reputation and to sue the media. How much longer can Ma and his kingdom stay alive?
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS