A few days ago, I made an announcement that I would not attend any of the Greater Tainan Council meetings until corruption cases against newly elected Tainan Council Speaker Lee Chuan-chiao (李全教) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are settled. I did so to safeguard Tainan’s dignity and to increase society’s engagement with local politics.
With the intention of transforming local politics, I propose using information transparency to promote an open government, which will make up for the shortcomings of the current system of representative politics in the municipality.
By stressing transparency in information disclosure, the decisionmaking process and service provision, the public can directly oversee and become involved in government. With the prevalence of the Internet, disclosure of government information not only makes civil oversight a possibility, but also, and perhaps more importantly, facilitates actual civic engagement.
An open government will not only be able to foster oversight through transparency, but also further civic participation and collaboration between the private and the public sectors. The civil movements that have taken place in recent years, including the Sunflower movement, validate the necessity of a transparent government.
Unlike in the past, information disclosure alone is not sufficient, for incomplete or static information can no longer meet the needs for civic engagement. The information has to be fully disclosed, as well as be easily and readily accessible and applicable. Only then can civic engagement be a reality.
When bribery is involved in local politics, the basis of a representative democracy is compromised, city councils will fail to represent the public will and public welfare is left by the wayside. This is what is happening in Tainan, and that is why I have proposed an open government that can deepen civic oversight and engagement to make Tainan’s government one that is truly governed by the people, and a democratic system that is shared by city residents.
This is brand-new thinking for a democracy, utilizing technology as the interface for civic engagement, and this form of democratic government will be transparent, engaging and collaborative. Based on these concepts, we have made public on the city government’s official Web site hundreds of compilations of information for the past year, and we will publish more policy information in the future for the public to oversee and review.
We will also invite the public to take part in the city government’s plan for transparent information. Over time, we will systematically realize the goal of an open government. Ultimately, we want all government information to be fully disclosed.
Furthermore, the city government will set up channels to directly communicate with citizens, such as complete, live broadcasts of city council meetings and mayoral conferences, and the continuation of the annual district meetings in which district councilors have face-to-face conversations with borough officers and residents.
Councilors will no longer be able to shirk their responsibility as supervisors, and will themselves be subject to public scrutiny.
William Lai is the mayor of Greater Tainan.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS