In 2000, Taiwan became a truly democratic nation when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the presidential election.
After eight years of DPP administration, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retook control of both the executive and legislative branches of government.
Thus far, the power transfer has been peaceful, and the nation appears to have passed the “two turnover test,” advocated in political science as the milestone for democratic consolidation.
Despite the KMT’s resounding defeat in the nine-in-one elections last month, whether the nation is set for true democratization remains uncertain. It must be forewarned that when a ruling party in a dictatorship loses power for whatever reason, it might attempt to cling to power by exercising all means possible once it retains it.
The KMT is unlikely to kick its bad habits and appears to continue to buy votes to win elections in both local and central governments.
When the DPP was in power, it could have followed the example of South Africa’s “truth and reconciliation” campaign to clean up the secret police and underground network inside KMT hierarchy.
Failing to do so meant failing to alleviate the KMT’s illicit activities, especially during elections.
Worse, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) hired 100 new Criminal Investigation Bureau agents as soon as he was sworn into office in 2008.
The computer sabotage of DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) campaign office during the 2012 presidential election, wiretapping in last month’s elections and an unusually high rate of traffic accidents involving student leaders associated with the Sunflower movement raised suspicions that the KMT still embraces its dark side.
The law of physics states that internal force does not work on itself. If the KMT is to evolve into a democratic party, it needs external pressure, such as the election defeat.
Now is the perfect chance for the KMT to emerge as a more open and honest political party, by recognizing that the majority of Taiwanese have voted for a government that listens to its people. The food safety scandals under the KMT administration illustrate the union between big businesses and elected officials, highlighting the levels of corruption that still exist.
Only when the KMT becomes a democratic party can the nation truly achieve democratic consolidation and become a liberal democracy that stands for freedom, equality and justice; rule of law; accountability of elected officials; and responsiveness to the mass citizenry.
James Hsu is professor emeritus in National Cheng Kung University’s physics department.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s