In 2000, Taiwan became a truly democratic nation when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the presidential election.
After eight years of DPP administration, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retook control of both the executive and legislative branches of government.
Thus far, the power transfer has been peaceful, and the nation appears to have passed the “two turnover test,” advocated in political science as the milestone for democratic consolidation.
Despite the KMT’s resounding defeat in the nine-in-one elections last month, whether the nation is set for true democratization remains uncertain. It must be forewarned that when a ruling party in a dictatorship loses power for whatever reason, it might attempt to cling to power by exercising all means possible once it retains it.
The KMT is unlikely to kick its bad habits and appears to continue to buy votes to win elections in both local and central governments.
When the DPP was in power, it could have followed the example of South Africa’s “truth and reconciliation” campaign to clean up the secret police and underground network inside KMT hierarchy.
Failing to do so meant failing to alleviate the KMT’s illicit activities, especially during elections.
Worse, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) hired 100 new Criminal Investigation Bureau agents as soon as he was sworn into office in 2008.
The computer sabotage of DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) campaign office during the 2012 presidential election, wiretapping in last month’s elections and an unusually high rate of traffic accidents involving student leaders associated with the Sunflower movement raised suspicions that the KMT still embraces its dark side.
The law of physics states that internal force does not work on itself. If the KMT is to evolve into a democratic party, it needs external pressure, such as the election defeat.
Now is the perfect chance for the KMT to emerge as a more open and honest political party, by recognizing that the majority of Taiwanese have voted for a government that listens to its people. The food safety scandals under the KMT administration illustrate the union between big businesses and elected officials, highlighting the levels of corruption that still exist.
Only when the KMT becomes a democratic party can the nation truly achieve democratic consolidation and become a liberal democracy that stands for freedom, equality and justice; rule of law; accountability of elected officials; and responsiveness to the mass citizenry.
James Hsu is professor emeritus in National Cheng Kung University’s physics department.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS