US President Barack Obama has had some bad luck recently.
First, two former US secretaries of defense and one former secretary of state appointed by him have published their memoirs, in which they accuse him of being indecisive and lacking a clear direction.
Second, his credit card was declined when he tried to pay for a meal at a New York restaurant while attending a meeting of the UN General Assembly.
The US president’s credit card was rejected — how can this be true? Occasionally, some poor or elderly, forgetful person may be rejected again and again when trying to pay with their credit cards. Now this has also happened to Obama, whose face is well-recognized all over the world.
Perhaps it is like Obama said: “It turned out I guess I don’t use it enough. So they thought there was some fraud going on.”
The New York restaurant simply rejected Obama’s credit card according to the law and asked him for another method of payment. In the face of this great embarrassment, the master of the White House had no choice but to rely on first lady Michelle Obama, who eventually paid with her credit card.
Obama said that this was not the first time his card had been rejected, and that sometimes he had to pay cash to save time.
This would not happen in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) Taiwan. After causing so much public anger, Ma is unlikely to dine out with first lady Chow Mei-ching (周美青) at any eatery without having first cleared it of any other visitors, for fear of being hit by shoes or books thrown by bystanders.
Even if he were to choose to dine out, Taiwanese hospitality and the culture of government-business collusion would preclude any restaurant operator from charging him, and he would never insist on paying them. In addition, no one would ever dare reject his credit card.
The attitude of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) politicians has always been condescending and they never pay any attention to the people at the bottom.
Nor would something like this happen in China. Chinese netizens were surprised when they saw then-US ambassador to China Gary Locke carrying his own bag when waiting in line to buy coffee.
They also used the incident as an opportunity to mock arrogant Chinese leaders and bureaucrats.
To create a friendly image, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) aides then arranged a publicity event in December last year, in which Xi ate steamed buns at a Beijing restaurant and paid for the meal himself.
Does the emperor really need to have cash in his pocket when going out? This notion seems to be removed from reality.
Former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) once tried to buy eggs from a farmer in the countryside to show how close he was to the common people. However, Chiang did not know the price of eggs, so he told an aide to give the farmer a few dollars.
This story, in which the “emperor” did not have any money and did not know the price of eggs, sounds much closer to reality.
James Wang is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS