The accusations against former Mainland Affairs Council deputy minister Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀), that he leaked state secrets to China, have left the public questioning the legitimacy of the government.
Anybody in battle protects their strategy with utmost confidentiality and do all they can to obtain their opponent’s classified information, to avoid defeat or becoming dependent on their adversary because they are unprepared — the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration is an exception.
Undercover operations and espionage have always been just as influential in victory as armed combat, as was the case during the Chinese Civil War between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Many of the memoirs that were released after the war evidenced this.
Cross-strait relations are often touted as a “friendship and peaceful interaction between brothers,” but the intelligence war has never ceased, or at least this holds true for China. Therefore, the discovery of a spy should come as no surprise.
This is why, when the US assigns senior officials to office, these officials must first go through a long series of strict and detailed security checks.
However, Taiwan does not seem to have such a mechanism in place and all sorts of gaps exist in its national defense. It is obvious that governmental organizations have been infiltrated at the highest levels and there is now a risk that cross-strait negotiations simply amount to a dialogue between CCP spies and CCP officials.
Few people have noticed that not only governmental organizations, but also civic groups are major targets for such infiltration. A great fear of all civic groups and democracy movements, including the opposition parties, is that nobody joins them and therefore they welcome just about anyone.
Based on long-term experience and observation, I believe that all civic groups, including the nation’s political parties, have been infiltrated by KMT and CCP spies up to the highest levels. These agents constantly fabricate issues to stir up meaningless debate and infighting and harm solidarity and unity, thus ensuring that official affairs cannot proceed smoothly.
This is an alarming development and only those with superhuman intellect and force of character can quickly and effectively put an end to all the damage that is occurring.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Drew Cameron
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
RSS