Less than one year after the industrial starch and adulterated oil cases sparked a nationwide food scare, a new tainted oil scandal has hit consumers at a time when the public prepare to eat mooncakes and barbecue with family or friends in celebration of the Mid-Autumn Festival.
Despite the rise of public attention to food safety and the authorities’ efforts to improve the quality of food manufacturing, the new scandal shows that there is still not enough being done to eliminate lawbreaking production lines.
More than 1,000 companies have reportedly purchased tainted lard oil products from manufacturer Chang Guann Co, directly or otherwise, with dissatisfied consumers returning goods and demanding refunds.
A number of well-known manufacturers, including Wei Chuan Foods Corp, Chi Mei Frozen Food Co and Sheng Hsiang Jen Foods Co, as well as some of the best-known bakeries, such as Yu Jen Jai and Lee Hu, have cried foul over the government’s Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certification system, because they have been placing orders with Chang Guann, a GMP-certified food manufacturer.
Nevertheless, how can those companies claim to be victims if they have not bothered to make on-site inspections at their suppliers’ production facilities? Make no mistake: It is simply an excuse for those companies to avoid being blamed by the public and penalized by the authorities. Stating publicly their intentions to demand huge compensation from Chang Guann is nothing but a smokescreen to cover their negligence about the quality of the ingredients they use.
Just as with the di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, or DEHP, scandal in 2011, when plasticizers were found to have been used to produce food and beverages, and the adulterated cooking oil scandal last year, when so-called “pure oil products” from several local firms were found to have mixed premium olive and grapeseed oils with less expensive cottonseed oil, the government said it would get tough on violators and asked all companies involved to pull questionable products off the shelves.
However, many of those products — ranging from numerous fried snacks cooked using the tainted oil in night markets nationwide, to the tortilla-like wrap used in dan bing (egg pancakes) at the Good Morning breakfast chain and zongzi (glutinous rice dumplings) made by Black Bridge Foods, along with another 100 or more food items — were consumed long ago. Government officials said the health impact would be limited, but the damage is already done.
The loophole allowing food manufacturers to cut corners and companies to neglect their quality control duties exists because the current penalties are too lax. The latest scandal has prompted the Consumers’ Foundation and food experts to call on the government to revise the laws and maximize the penalties for breaking the law. The government must act on this plea or else its efforts to fight adulterated products will remain ineffective.
There has been a new vigilance in prosecuting careless food manufacturers, but this scandal has again damaged the nation’s international credibility. GMP certification or any other form of self-imposed measures in the food industry are not sufficient to ensure food safety.
Legislators and government officials must make the necessary law changes and enforce heavy punishments to deter lawbreakers, enhance the public’s eroding confidence in food authorities and rebuild the nation’s reputation.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS