The legislature on Tuesday voted on President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) nominations for members of the Control Yuan during its second extraordinary session this summer.
While Chang Po-ya (張博雅) and Sun Ta-chuan’s (孫大川) nominations for the positions of president and vice president respectively were approved, along with 16 of the 27 remaining members, 11 of Ma’s nominations were rejected. Although the Control Yuan can continue to operate until the current term expires today, the outcome of the decisions will have a major impact on Ma and on the operations of the next Control Yuan.
There were early signs of this massive rejection. At the first review during the legislature’s first extraordinary session earlier this summer, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators engaged in a silent protest against the Presidential Office and the nominees by letting the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) get away with an easy blockade of the review. However, the Presidential Office ignored the protest, and Ma and the KMT did not listen to public calls for strict assessment of the nominees’ qualifications. Losing 11 of the nominees is a big setback, and Ma’s prestige as a leader has once again suffered a heavy blow.
The president has repeatedly insisted that the standard for deciding whether to approve a nominee should be based solely on whether the candidate meets the necessary conditions required for the position. Although KMT legislators at an early stage expressed concerns over some of the nominees’ qualifications, Ma insisted that the party line should take precedence over individual legislators’ wishes as well as public opinion, saying that a decision on whether to support specific nominees should not be determined by rumor or personal opinions.
During the DPP’s time in government, the list of Control Yuan candidates nominated by then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was blocked in the legislature by the KMT-led pan-blue camp for three years. In the end, the KMT claimed that Chen had lost legitimacy because of his low approval rating, and that it was best for the country that the Control Yuan cease operations. Despite that, KMT hopefuls continue their efforts to be nominated for Control Yuan positions.
Ma’s approval rating is half of what Chen’s was. Not only does he lack any legitimacy, even the nominations for Control Yuan president and the vice president were strongly questioned. As the public continues to challenge the institution’s existence, outgoing Control Yuan President Wang Chien-hsien (王建煊) has been telling the press that the list of nominees is packed with henchlings, stooges and vote captains who have been nominated as thanks for services rendered, because they fawn on Ma or because of election concerns.
Given the lack of legitimacy and the unreasonable composition of the list of nominees, it was only to be expected that Ma’s private lobbying and attempts to order KMT legislators around, demanding that they pass the whole list, would fail miserably.
The president does not consider his faults and mistakes. He bulldozes over public opinion and shifts blame to the DPP. A press release from the party continued to blame the DPP for its “vicious” blockade of the vote.
From the service trade agreement through the Sunflower movement to the current debacle over Control Yuan nominations, Ma’s prestige as a leader has taken some severe beatings. Not only has he hurt his own credibility, he has also jeopardized the future of the Control Yuan and the country.
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily