Is Denmark’s apparent change in its “one China” policy a warning to Taiwan about what might come in the future? Denmark seems to move ahead alone, but if this policy is spreading to other EU member countries, it will make it even more difficult for Taiwanese to determine their own future. That the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government considers Taiwan a part of China might even encourage this development.
Denmark appears to be on its way to change its “one China” policy in direction of considering Taiwan as a part of China.
This is not only questioning Denmark’s democratic values, but put it on the side of China in its territorial claims in Asia.
It appears that Denmark holds to the antiquated belief that dominating countries have the right to territories in their neighborhood without asking the local population, as Russia has done in Ukraine.
The apparent policy change is obvious from the Danish Foreign Ministry’s Web site, where Taiwan is listed as a part of China together with the Chinese flag and a map shows Taiwan as a part of China.
In a correspondence with the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the ministry does not acknowledge that this is an error, but refers to the general and ongoing evaluation of the content of the Web site.
The chairman of the Foreign Policy Committee of the Danish parliament is in line with the Danish foreign ministry.
In conclusion, an evaluation of the content of the Web site has approved that Taiwan is a part of China.
Moreover, since the ministry does not admit to any mistakes, Denmark’s “one China” policy has changed and it has broken with the policy of the vast majority of countries in the international community.
The vast majority of countries’ “one China” policy consider the People’s Republic of China as the sole government of China, but the same policy does not mention Taiwan.
Consequently, Taiwan is not considered as a part of China.
More than ever, it is clear that investments and trade with China has a higher value than democratic ideals. When it comes to Taiwan, its 23 million people are of minor importance, despite the fact that Taiwanese do not want to be part of China.
Today, the Sunflower movement and various demonstrations have shown that the so-called peaceful development between Taiwan and China over the past six years has met with great skepticism and clear demands for much greater transparency.
China’s aggressive behavior in the South and East China seas have made Asian countries concerned about its growing military and economic power.
Concerns raised by the US, Japan and Vietnam at the last meeting of Asia’s Security Forum are shared by other Asian countries.
Denmark is taking a European solo ride in changing its “one China” policy to support China’s claim to Taiwan.
Considering the most recent developments in Taiwan, and China’s behavior, it does not bode well for Denmark’s international reputation, but at least the two pandas that Denmark will receive from China over the coming year will feel right at home.
Michael Danielsen is chairman of Taiwan Corner.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS