After World War II, Taiwan made the transition from the Japanese to the Chinese era and the China of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
After 1949, the KMT’s China existed only in Taiwan, while the five-starred red flag flew over the territory that was the foundation of its Constitution. In 1971, the nation lost the right to represent China in the UN.
The reason that the KMT of China became part of Taiwan and that Chinese culture became a part of Taiwanese culture was that colonizers are transitory; like the wind, they come and they go.
Japanese culture was absorbed into Taiwanese culture because it remained here when the Japanese left. The same thing will happen to Chinese culture.
Not all Chinese in Taiwan were members of the KMT and not every member of the KMT was high up in the party’s chain of command. Some Chinese became Taiwanese, and some Taiwanese became KMT members and even became part of the KMT hierarchy.
In an era when literature was used as a tool to disseminate government policy and ideals, there was some literature that did not fit the mold of the literary establishment that entered Taiwan from China after the war.
Author Kenneth Pai’s (白先勇) father, former minister of national defense Pai Chung-hsi (白崇禧) was a member of the Guangxi Faction, which was not very much liked by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
In Taiwan, he was lonely and marginalized by the regime. This was also the reason why he never had to shoulder any of the political responsibility for the imposition of martial law and the authoritarian era.
His misfortune turned out to be a benefit, because without it, the world might never have had the chance to appreciate Kenneth Pai’s literature. The book Healing the Pain: General Pai Chung-hsi and the 228 Incident (止痛療傷:白崇禧將軍與二二八) by Kenneth Pai and historian Liao Yen-po (廖彥博) contains deep historical insights.
The younger Pai’s collection of short stories Taipei People (台北人) describes the sentiments felt, and the loneliness of the families of government officials after the KMT was routed and fled to Taiwan in 1949.
Another collection, The New Yorker, describes his experiences living in a foreign land, as he stayed in the US after his studies.
These collections portray the atmosphere among young Taiwanese after the war — including those who entered Taiwan after 1949 — who sought to study at National Taiwan University and then go to the US.
The characters and situations portrayed in his books cover both the US and Taiwan, and recently a play based on his novel Crystal Boys (孽子) toured Taiwan.
Loneliness and feeling unwanted are key themes in the writer’s novels, and while socialists and moralists may be critical, the work of Kenneth Pai has become popular in Taiwan and China — just as Eileen Chang’s (張愛玲) works have become popular in both nations — because they are situated on the fringe of politics and portray spiritual exile.
These kinds of novels contain more truth than history books that are manipulated by the KMT.
They prove that poetry speaks more truth than historical fact. This kind of literature will continue to exist even after the KMT has turned Taiwanese history on its head.
Taiwanese must know about this politically marginalized literature and poetry if they are going to be able to see the faces and hear the voices of those who live their lives in the darker corners of society.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily