During US President Barack Obama’s seven-day visit to Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and Philippines, the issue of security cooperation was at the fore. As other East Asian countries are worried about China copying what Russia is doing in Ukraine, Obama’s trip through the “first island chain” sent a message to US allies in the Asia-Pacific region that restored some faith in Washington’s rebalancing policy.
Although Obama only passed over the nation’s airspace, it is safe to say that unless Taiwan plans to surrender to China and resist Washington, the US’ regional strengthening of military cooperation is a positive thing for stability and security in the Taiwan Strait.
Obama sent signals that Taiwan must attend to, although considering the actions of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government, these signals might have a negative impact on the nation. They include Obama’s support for Japan strengthening its right to self-defense and US support for the Philippines’ filing for international arbitration to handle territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
While Obama disapproved of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe sending a ritual offering to the Yasukuni Shrine, the US does not associate that with militarism. The US believes that Japan is a peaceful country and it is central to Washington developing bilateral alliances in a multipolar Asia-Pacific region.
However, the Ma administration is in accord with China’s anti-Japanese sentiment, which interprets Japan’s normalization as a move toward restoring militarism. This is not only out of touch with reality, but also contrary to the US’ policy of encouraging allies to upgrade their military strength and is unhelpful to national interests or the improvement of Taipei-Tokyo relations.
Another potential problem is linked to US support for the Philippines filing for international arbitration. In late March, the Philippines requested that the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, review whether China’s “nine-dash line” — which China uses for its territorial claims in the South China Sea — is in line with international law. The request has been accepted and Obama applauded the move for being in sync with Washington’s desire that territorial disputes in the area be handled in a peaceful manner and in line with international law.
Developments suggest it is possible that China’s nine-dash line will be ruled a violation of international law. Because the Ma administration has proposed a “U-shaped line” — which is extremely similar to the nine-dash line — for dealing with territorial disputes in the area, the US has said that Taiwan should form a claim different to China’s. However, the Ma administration, insisting that cross-strait relations be conducted under the concept of “one country, two areas” (一國兩區), has rejected this suggestion.
If the nine-dash line is ruled a violation of international law, then the U-shaped line will also be negated. Since Taiwan is unable to take part in negotiations on territorial disputes in the South China Sea, if the nation’s claim is judged to be illegal and it is unable to come up with a ( claim) that is in line with international law, then the entire basis for the claim to Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) the largest of the disputed Spratly Islands, also known as the Nansha Islands (南沙群島), will cease to exist.
Taiwan should capitalize on the US government’s rebalancing policy and propose a stance on territorial disputes in the South China Sea different to that of China’s nine-dash line. It is fine to disputes claims to Itu Aba Island, but if the nation loses the island, national interests will be severely hurt.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Drew Cameron
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS