Wed, Apr 30, 2014 page8

• [ LETTERS ]

  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Wrong TRA message sent?

  Two weeks ago, the US Senate’s Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs held a hearing called “Evaluating US Policy on the 35th Anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).”

  Those who know the basic tenets that shape US-Taiwan relations understand that these hearings typically consist of two primary (and for the most part, predictable) themes:

  Members of the US Congress proclaiming their unwavering support for Taiwan and its democracy, and when called to testify, staff from Foggy Bottom read out pre-cleared talking points, many of which seemingly have not been updated since the act’s implementation in 1979.

  The aforementioned hearing was on its way to repeating this pattern before ranking committee member US Senator Marco Rubio asked US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Russel: “Does the [US President Barack] Obama Administration remain committed to [former] president [Ronald] Reagan’s so-called ‘six assurances’ to Taiwan? Is that still our position?”

  Unlike Russel’s predecessor, Kurt Campbell, who in a 2011 US House of Representatives hearing on Taiwan reiterated repeatedly that “the United States abides by the so-called six assurances,” Russel only confirmed that the assurances were “an element” of Washington’s approach to Taiwan relations.

  Russel’s answer was troubling on a number of levels, since even subtle changes in wording from the US Department of State on Washington’s official “unofficial” relationship with Taipei could have far-reaching ramifications.

  In a relationship often clouded by US ambiguity, the six assurances have not only helped give Taiwanese government officials a certain level of clarification and certainty; they have also shown other countries that the US can be counted on as a reliable and committed partner within a bilateral relationship framework.

  However, perhaps just as important is whether Beijing perceives Russel’s testimony as a subtle, yet clear change in Washington’s Taiwan policy — a potentially inaccurate perception that could lead China to miscalculate on how to approach its relationship with Taiwan, as well as the US.

  China experts have long said that Beijing gives documents such as the three US-China joint communiques and agreements of intent such as Cairo Declaration of 1943 a much higher level of importance than many other countries (albeit primarily when such documents suit its official narrative).

  While some experts may deem a potential alteration or downgrading of a policy such as the six assurances as being of rather low importance, Beijing undoubtedly sees it the other way.

  It is worth repeating that Russel’s testimony last week does not mean that there has been a shift in US policy toward Taiwan, but it could be interpreted that way and therein lies the problem.

  Brian Benedictus

  Falls Church, Virginia

  Phase out nuclear power

  A statement issued by Academia Sinica and signed by the institute’s dean, deputy dean and 23 academics has urged the government to hold a referendum on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮).

  Several facts mentioned in the statement deserve consideration: The first is that Taiwan houses six of the world’s 12 high-risk nuclear reactors in earthquake-prone areas.

  In addition, it ranks second in terms of the population density of the areas around these reactors and becomes No. 1 if population density is measured per unit of habitable land.

  Furthermore, Taiwan is targeted by 1,600 Chinese missiles. Given these facts, it is not an exaggeration to say that Taiwan has one of the highest, if not the highest, risk of suffering a nuclear disaster.

  The nation no longer has space in which to store nuclear waste and shipping it overseas to North Korea and China is not a reliable solution. Understandably, the Aborigines on Orchid Island refuse to accept any more atomic waste, some of which has also been secretly stored in Taoyuan County’s Longtan Township (龍潭).

  Only 8.3 percent of the energy used by the nation is generated by nuclear power. Through all-out conservation and efficient combustion, including preheating combustion air with flue gas and combustion air oxygen enrichment, atomic power can be phased out.

  Taiwan emits 11.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide per capita per year, compared with the global average of 4.5 tonnes. Taiwanese’s per capita income is lower than that of Japanese and Europeans, yet Taiwan manages to have higher carbon dioxide emissions than Japan or Europe. This means that a lot of energy must be being wasted.

  Using natural gas or liquefied natural gas instead of coal or oil is an effective way to reduce emissions, so converting the Gongliao plant to a natural gas-fired facility would help cut the nation’s carbon footprint while meeting its energy needs. Solar and geothermal energy should be developed concurrently.

  The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant’s fate is a technical rather than political issue. The Executive Yuan needs to promptly make a wise decision based on the high risk of a nuclear disaster and finding a feasible solution for Taiwan’s energy problems.

  Charles Hong

  Columbus, Ohio
• Most Popular

  • 1

    US removes no independence statement

  • 2

    Taiwan thanks Japan for family registry change

  • 3

    MAC warns of PRC arrests, detentions

  • 4

    Taiwan blacklists two Chinese schools

  • 5

    Inter denied top spot in Serie A by rivals Juve