During the past few years, there has been a tendency among Western policymakers to be lulled into slumber by the refrain from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government that it is reducing tension across the Taiwan Strait and that its policies are beneficial to stability.
For example, during an April 4 hearing in the US Senate, US Assistant Secretary of State Danny Russel said: “As a general matter, we very much welcome and applaud the extraordinary progress that has occurred in cross-strait relations under the Ma administration.”
Regrettably, Russel and others are betting on the wrong horse. The problem with the “progress” in cross-strait relations is that it has occurred under false premises: Ma has given China’s leaders the idea that these moves are eventually leading to “reunification,” — the absorption of Taiwan into China’s suffocating embrace.
This accommodating approach is now colliding with the aspirations of the Taiwanese to remain free, and to defend hard-won democracy. Ma’s approach is also fundamentally flawed, as it is in direct contravention of the basic principles of freedom, democracy and self-determination: the right of Taiwanese to determine their own future.
In some ways, Ma’s approach is analogous to that of former British prime minister Neville Chamberlain, who tried to accommodate an expansionist German regime that was moving against its neighbors Poland and Czechoslovakia. If the West had followed Churchill’s advice in 1938 and remained firm against German designs, then World War II might not have happened.
Real progress can only be made if China can be made to understand that it needs to accept Taiwan as a peaceful neighbor, that it needs to dismantle the more than 1,600 missiles aimed at Taiwan and that it needs to agree to international space for Taiwan, so it can be a full and equal member in the international community.
The democratic West can help normalization of relations across the Taiwan Strait by moving to normalize their own diplomatic relations with Taiwan. The country’s diplomatic isolation was prompted by the fact that in the 1960s and 1970s, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was still claiming to represent China. That led to its international derecognition.
However, since then, Taiwan has made its momentous transition to democracy, so it is time to move away from old ideas and toward a new policy that accepts a vibrant democracy as a member of the international family of nations.
The recent Sunflower demonstrations in Taiwan and Ma’s extremely low approval ratings show clearly that Taiwanese do not want to be pushed in the direction of a repressive China, but want to play their role in the global community.
The Sunflower students and their supporters want Taiwan to grow and flourish, but that can only happen if the country can play its full role internationally and not be hampered and inhibited by restrictions and constraints imposed by an undemocratic regime next door.
Taiwanese and the international community need to bet on the racehorse of freedom and democracy, and celebrate Taiwan’s unique identity and strengths.
Mei-chin Chen is a commentator based in Washington.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS