The Sunflower movement has come to an end and the cross-strait service trade agreement is to enter the legislative review process. This means that the question of whether it can be changed once again will come into focus.
The treaties and agreements that Taiwan has signed with other countries rarely take immediate effect. They must first be approved or transformed by the legislature so they can become part of domestic legislation. When it comes to international or multilateral treaties or agreements, they are decided by majority decision among the participating countries. If each country could adjust the contents of these agreements unilaterally, the above norms and standards would be meaningless.
For example, the 1998 Rome Statute which established the International Criminal Court stresses universal jurisdiction over international crime. It will thus interfere with national criminal jurisdiction, which is why over 30 signatories to the statue still have not ratified or transformed it into domestic legislation. The US and Israel even refused to sign it because they say it encroaches on their national interests. Although it can be changed, Article 121 of the statute states that changes to the text must be approved by two-thirds of the signatories and ratified by seven-eighths of all signatories before the changes can take effect. Reaching these numbers is quite a challenge. This means when signing international agreements of this importance, the legislatures of the signatory countries in effect have to approve or reject the agreement as a whole.
When bilateral treaties and agreements are signed under coercion, for example when the losing side in a war signs a peace agreement, the legislature likely has no choice but to accept the facts and forget about altering the document even if the agreement is unfair.
Any agreements signed with other countries that involve the public’s rights or have a major impact on the nation must of course be reviewed by the legislature, which can also alter the proposal, regardless of whether it is a treaty, an agreement or an accord. However, any changes made during the review must be negotiated with the counterpart and resigned after a consensus has been reached. It must then be sent back to the legislature, where it once again enters the cycle of review, re-signing and follow-up reviews.
Based on Constitutional Interpretation 329, because the service trade agreement has a great impact on the public’s rights and interests, the legislature has the right to review and amend it. However, once amended, negotiations with China must be restarted. This will lead to a long period of talks which might break down. This would of course have a negative impact on future talks with other countries. This issue shows that, in terms of the signing of any agreement with another country, democratic oversight prior to and during negotiations is more important than review after it has been negotiated. This shows it is necessary to institutionalize an oversight mechanism for cross-strait and other international agreements as soon as possible.
To sum up, the question of whether cross-strait agreements can be changed cannot be answered with a simple yes or no. In addition to considering international precedent and domestic legislation, it also hinges on international realities and political wrangling.
Wu Ching-chin is an associate professor and chair of Aletheia University’s law department.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Many local news media last week reported that COVID-19 is back, citing doctors’ observations and the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics. The CDC said that cases would peak this month and urged people to take preventive measures. Although COVID-19 has never been eliminated, it has become more manageable, and restrictions were dropped, enabling people to return to their normal way of life due to decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In Taiwan, mandatory reporting of confirmed cases and home isolation ended in March last year, while the mask mandate at hospitals and healthcare facilities stopped in May. However, the CDC last week said the number