On Feb. 2 high school civics and society teachers from around the nation assembled outside the Ministry of Education to protest how the government’s “minor adjustments” to the high school curriculum guidelines ignore due process. Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧), dismissing their objections as a minority view, did not receive their petition and rushed through changes that in no way reflected the views of teachers, declaring the whole process to be constitutional, legal and perfectly in line with procedure.
On Friday last week, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) strenuously defended the minister in the Legislative Yuan, saying the changes conformed to the spirit of the Constitution and that factual errors gave rise to different interpretations that were used for political ends. Perhaps the premier would like to elaborate on how ordinary members of the public are able to manipulate information for political ends when the state apparatus is under the government’s control.
The core demands made by the Civics Teachers Action Alliance have not changed. What we object to is the non-transparent way in which these curriculum adjustments were decided upon. We are calling on the ministry to implement procedural justice. This has nothing to do with political affiliation, or a position vis-a-vis independence from or unification with China. It is something all civics teachers can understand and identify with.
For the past 10 years or so, amendments to the curriculum guidelines have first been proposed by the ministry and then subjected to a set procedure, and only passed after consensus has been forged over a period of time.
This time, the ministry has invented an entirely different procedure. It has set up a — legally questionable — curriculum guidelines “review group” to decide whether the present guidelines are “constitutional” and, ignoring the opinions of teachers who teach the subject, hammered out these changes behind closed doors, and forced them through.
Several days ago, alliance members applied for access — according to the Freedom of Government Information Law (政府資訊公開法) — to the minutes of the 12-year national basic education curriculum review committee, together with information on the committee’s votes, to get to the bottom of things. The ministry’s reply was that the minutes of the meeting belong to the ministry, were preparatory in nature and confidential. If you want an example of political manipulation, you need look no further than how the ministry refuses access to information.
The alliance is calling on civics teachers nationwide to join us outside the ministry tomorrow and on Saturday, to demand — before it is too late — that the government listen to public opinion, respect academic expertise, restart the public hearing process and reinstate procedural justice.
Chou Wei-tung and Kao Chuan-po are civics teachers at high schools and members of the Civics Teachers Action Alliance.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS