The much-anticipated meeting between Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) and his Chinese counterpart, Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍), took place in Nanjing, China, on Tuesday. This meeting is important to the development of cross-strait relations for a number of reasons.
China made some concessions to make Taiwanese officials willing to visit, and Zhang referred to Wang as “Minister Wang.” Obviously, after talking about power and following last year’s APEC meeting, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has new ideas about Beijing’s policy toward further political and substantial cross-strait relations.
Still, on the whole, China remains very careful when it comes to Wang’s title, which shows how China currently views cross-strait political relations. The only time the title “minister” was used to refer to Wang was during the meeting with Zhang. In reports, Wang was still referred to as the “responsible official of Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council” in China’s Chinese-language reports and as “Taiwan’s mainland affairs chief” in its English-language coverage.
Also worthy of note is that Zhang and the Chinese media completely avoided the use of the term “Mainland Affairs Council under the Executive Yuan.” This shows that China was merely trying to create an atmosphere beneficial to getting leaders from the two sides to meet and that China has not yet decided to accept the Republic of China’s (ROC) sovereignty and right to govern, to avoid a situation in which “two Chinas” or “one China, two governments” occurs.
Furthermore, observers were left with the feeling that little was achieved at the meeting. Wang and Zhang agreed to give Taiwanese students studying in China access to Chinese medical insurance, but failed to reach agreement on humanitarian visitation rights for Taiwanese in China and Taiwan’s participation in Asian regional economic groups, which shows that the two sides still differ greatly when it comes to more sensitive and important issues. China still restricts the ability of Taiwanese organizations in China to make humanitarian visits to Taiwanese citizens in Chinese prisons, saying there are additional conditions that need to be negotiated.
However, it can be said that China is extremely willing to see the exchange of liaison offices as soon as possible to further cross-strait relations. As for Taiwan’s participation in regional economic groups, China said it hopes cross-strait trade relations will be improved first, while at the same time building mutual dependency, before allowing Taiwan to participate in regional economic organizations in an effort to avoid distancing the two sides from each other.
Neither Wang nor Zhang commented on a meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Xi during their post-meeting press conferences — most likely because conditions are not yet ripe and because of the overall sensitivity of the issue.
The Wang-Zhang meeting was mostly symbolic, but does demonstrate a real improvement in cross-strait relations facilitated by the Ma administration since it came into office in 2008. Since the leaders of both sides were willing to come up with a mechanism for the normalization of meetings, this suggests a brighter outlook for development of cross-strait relations. Although the first Wang-Zhang meeting did not see a lot of substantial results, with a mechanism like this in place, many cross-strait issues will be easier to discuss and solve in the future.
Wang Kao-cheng is a professor in the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS