Historiography is a way for a government to form the collective memory and textbooks are a means to disseminate ideology. This has been an effective way of ruling as history and textbooks are used to brainwash the public by deciding what they should and should not know, all so a government can build its legitimacy.
This can be seen in the steps the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and the Japanese government are taking to change school curricula in their countries to support their rule.
The Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology has decided to revise teachers’ manuals for junior and senior-high schools to emphasize that the Takeshima Islands — known as Dokdo in Korean — and the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan and the Diaoyu Archipelago (釣魚群島) in China —“are part of Japanese territory.” It is also requiring that textbook publishers follow these rules.
The Study Guide Outline is a guide for textbook publishers and teachers, and the commentary accompanying these guidelines is generally amended once every 10 years. The next amendment was due in 2016, but the Japanese government has moved it forward, showing the urgency with which it wants to consolidate domestic public opinion and its stance internationally.
If this is an objective view of the Japanese government’s efforts, then the textbook changes proposed by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration are also politically motivated, intended to shape the public’s Greater China awareness as well as ingratiate the administration with China.
The new curriculum will change “China” to “mainland China” and “the era of Japanese rule” to “the Japanese colonial era,” changing more than one-third of the curriculum. These are clearly not minor adjustments as the Ministry of Education claims; they are major changes. As expected, the planned shift from a Taiwanese historical perspective to a Greater China outlook has drawn protests from historians.
Although the government’s motive for changing textbooks is very clear, things may not work out the way it wants. Textbooks must be factual and they must comply with reality and with public awareness and expectations. If the government tries to turn textbooks into a tool for its obscurantism, not only will the public be disappointed, but the historical awareness within the textbook framework and public trust in the government will also collapse.
Taiwanese learned this during the Martial Law era, during which education was based on the obscurantist policies of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). When Taiwanese traveled abroad, where they could obtain a wealth of information contradicting what they had learned in school, they became vehement opponents of the Chiangs.
The Japanese government’s decision that its students should be taught that Dokdo, which is governed by Seoul, and the Diaoyutais, which belong to Taiwan but are governed by Tokyo, all belong to Japan, is untenable legally and in the face of international realities.
Using textbooks to brainwash children will only add to the public’s frustration.
The historical outlook of the Ma administration, which ignores the Taiwanese awareness that has developed over the past two decades and is hoping that its textbook changes will restore the Chiang-era goal of “retaking the mainland” is unrealistic and out of step with public expectations.
Even if students are taught this outlook in class, they will hear and learn otherwise at home, in society at large and on the Internet. The problems created by such cognitive conflict will have a negative impact on the government.
In the end, the curriculum changes will be just another misstep by Ma the bumbler.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS