The government inaugurated the National Development Council (NDC) under the Cabinet on Wednesday last week, making it a top government agency in charge of comprehensive planning, administrative coordination, resource distribution and management control.
The NDC merges the Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) and the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC), as well as parts of the Public Construction Commission, with former CEPD minister Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) serving as head of the new agency.
The agency’s establishment means the dissolution of the CEPD, which was set up in December 1977.
However, it also indicates the organizational evolution of an economic policymaking bureaucracy dating back to 1948, when the Council for US Aid (CUSA) was formed to administer the use of US funds in reconstructing the nation’s economy.
Over the past six decades, such economic bureaucracy has undergone several changes in terms of organizational structure and functions. For example, in 1963, the CUSA was reorganized into the Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development, which was replaced by the Economic Planning Council in 1973 before transforming into the CEPD in 1977.
Even though these organizations performed various functions to cope with the nation’s economic needs at the time, they nevertheless had the authority as a large Cabinet agency and played an important role in drafting economic policies and advising on economic issues referred to it by the Cabinet.
However, this economic bureaucracy lost its significance in the last 10 years, with the CEPD degraded to a mere staff organ and its functions reduced to economic planning and research as a result of changes in the external environment, internal personnel and tensions among government agencies.
Therefore, the reorganization of the CEPD into the NDC indicates the government’s recognition of the inefficiency of economic planning and its anticipation of the consolidation of real policymaking power.
The move marks the government’s desire to have a more capable economic bureaucracy able to help Taiwan regain economic vitality and enhance the public’s quality of life within the extraordinary situation it faces.
At the same time, the public would hope the establishment of NDC, which incorporates functions of three agencies, could substantially improve government efficiency, about which they have long complained.
Speaking at the inaugural ceremony on Wednesday, Kuan said the NDC’s activities are to focus on national policies on economy, society, human resources, cultural development, spatial planning and government administration. In other words, it will not just focus on economic development, but also all policies that can shape the nation’s future direction.
However, for Kuan to accomplish his job successfully, the NDC needs to integrate functions that were previously under the domain of other agencies. In addition to its role of plan formulation, the new council also must effectively coordinate, evaluate and supervise the execution of plans initiated by other agencies. In a nutshell, this is about government efficiency.
Most importantly, the NDC should avoid a closed-door policymaking process in the much more complex macroeconomic situation it faces, because that is not going to satisfy the needs of the public and the nation as a whole.
The public would appreciate Kuan’s efforts to develop Taiwan as a free economic nation and help it sign more free-trade pacts with other countries. However, the public would be grateful if this new body could understand that developing a more holistic approach to enhancing Taiwan’s social security, environmental protection and labor rights is as important as formulating economic plans.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of
RSS