Determining whether stories about North Korea are true or false means delving into a very wide, gray area where the genuinely surreal mixes confusingly with the patently absurd.
For example, which of these reports about North Korean leader Kim Jong-un appears — at least on paper — the more likely?
That he executed his uncle by feeding him naked to a pack of starving dogs, or that his birthday celebrations in Pyongyang were led by a serenade from a former cross-dressing, US National Basketball Association all-star with a penchant for facial piercings and celebrity wrestling?
The latter is borne out by a YouTube video showing ex-Chicago Bulls guard Dennis Rodman’s off-tune rendition of Happy Birthday before an exhibition basketball match watched by Kim on Wednesday last week.
On the other hand, the death-by-dog story, which was picked up by some international media, was apparently based on a satirical tweet posted on a Chinese Web site.
This was then picked up by Hong Kong-based newspaper Wen Wei Po, leading to shocked headlines in the Western media.
Differentiating fact from fiction is particularly difficult when it comes to North Korea, given the country’s profound isolation, which makes any story not sanctioned by its highly secretive regime almost impossible to verify.
At the same time, international interest in what goes on in North Korea is enormous, especially when it comes to sensational stories that satisfy a widespread perception of the country as brutal, backward and bizarre.
These factors combine to create a cavernous media echo chamber that provides resonance and substance to rumor and speculation.
Elements can then be cherry-picked and put together into a sensational news item, as happened with the rumors swirling around Kim’s purge and execution of his uncle, and political mentor, Jang Song-thaek last month.
The most spectacular version would read something like this: Kim Jong-un had his elderly uncle, who had an affair with Kim’s wife, fed naked to a pack of 120 starving dogs, thereby inducing a heart attack in his aunt, who now lies in a vegetative coma.
A number of these elements originated from the mainstream South Korean media and North Korean defector-run Web sites — both of which, analysts note, have a vested interest in painting the North and its leadership as a source of unimaginable horror.
Choi Jung-hoon, director of the Free North Korea radio station in Seoul, said the media frenzy surrounding Jang’s execution had proved particularly fertile ground.
“News from such a closed country like the North still remains limited ... leaving unconfirmed speculation to fill the void,” said Choi, himself a defector.
“People are just imagining what they believe may go on in North Korea — a weird, wild place where apparently anything can happen,” said Choi, who fled his homeland in 2007.
“Sometimes the picture they draw is so ridiculous, so different from the country I lived in and know,” he added.
However, North Korea is complicit in fostering the atmosphere that generates the sensational headlines.
Its relentless bolstering of the personality cult surrounding the ruling Kim dynasty and its apocalyptic, high-decibel threats of nuclear war are mostly meant for domestic consumption, but are nevertheless pounced on by the rest of the world as evidence of a country driven by paranoid delusion.
The language used by the state media in denouncing Jang was especially breathless and colorful, accusing him of womanizing, drug-taking and general decadence, and labeling him “despicable human scum ... worse than a dog.”
Such hyperbole is the default setting for North Korean propaganda and its tone only serves to lend credence to the more outlandish stories published about the regime.
As well as ravenous dogs, other reported methods of execution in North Korea have included flamethrowers and mortar shells.
The North’s refusal to deny or confirm most reports helps keep the rumor mill turning over, although it has taken umbrage at some stories concerning Kim.
A report that Kim had undergone plastic surgery to look more like his grandfather, North Korea’s founding leader Kim Il-sung, was denounced by state media as a “hideous criminal act.”
It also threatened to kill the authors of a story that Kim Jong-un used Adolf Hitler’s memoir Mein Kampf as a leadership guide and condemned reports that it had executed several state performers by machine gun to cover up the allegedly decadent past of his young wife.
Kang Chan-ho, a senior journalist and a North Korea specialist with Seoul’s liberal Hankyoreh daily, said many stories were concocted by the North’s critics.
“Some defectors tend to mix their own personal sense of grievance against Pyongyang with rumors that can never really be verified,” Kang said.
“News media amplify these unverifiable stories to cater to their readers, who like to read such wild stories about the North,” he added.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS