The DPP is in the middle of a debate on how to approach its China policy. It is good that the party is having this debate because it shows that senior members are willing to reflect on how to shape the nation’s relations with its giant neighbor across the Taiwan Strait.
This creative thinking contrasts sharply with what is happening within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), where senior members — led by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — are still reiterating outdated “unification” ideas that have their origin in concepts stemming from the beginning of the 20th century.
Hardly fit for modern-day free and democratic Taiwan which is entering the 21st Century.
However, among the viable ideas proposed within the context of the DPP debate, there is one dissonant: the suggestion by DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) that the party freeze the so-called Taiwan independence clause in its charter.
Ker seems to be under the impression that putting the clause on ice will somehow bring the party more votes, particularly from those in the middle of Taiwan’s polarized political spectrum.
He also thinks that the repressive regime in Beijing will be more amenable to holding talks with the DPP if it puts the clause on the back burner.
Ker is daydreaming on both scores.
Suspending the clause will not make the DPP more attractive to voters in Taiwan.
The reason is simple: According to the DPP’s own opinion poll, given a free choice, Taiwanese are overwhelmingly in favor of independence as future option for their country.
The problem is that the continuing military and economic threats by China are preventing Taiwanese from having a free choice.
So, what would be good policies for the DPP to promote in order for it to have a chance to win in the next presidential and legislative elections?
First and foremost, it needs to have social and economic policies that are fair and equitable.
People are most concerned about their welfare, and during the past years of KMT governance, the income gap has widened, the unemployment rate has increased, young people cannot find work, and economic growth has stalled.
Ma has said that Taiwan’s economic engine can only be restarted by establishing closer links to China.
This is false. Putting all of Taiwan’s eggs into the “one China” basket is dangerous, as the country would become over-reliant on its giant and unstable neighbor.
Recent press reports say that even well-known international financier George Soros is worried about an economic meltdown in China.
Second, Taiwan needs to establish closer economic — and even political — relations with democratic nations that share its principles and values, such as the US, Japan, South Korea and Western Europe.
Only if it broadens its international ties can Taiwan avoid being dragged down by the upcoming economic slowdown in China.
Third, freezing the independence clause will only whet China’s appetite, and push Taiwan further into a corner.
Beijing will pour additional demands on the DPP, like accepting the so-called “1992 consensus” or the infamous “one China” principle, which would leave Taiwan even less room to maneuver, and no free choice whatsoever.
So if Ker has the interests of Taiwan’s hard-won democracy and freedom close to his heart, he needs to quickly wake up from his daydreaming and return to the reality of today’s Taiwan.
Mei-chin Chen is a commentator based in Washington.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS