The draft bill for “diverse family formation” (多元成家) has been a topic of much debate, and has created a lot of turbulence in Christian churches. Some churches have posted videos opposing the bill on their Facebook pages, telling members to share the videos as widely as possible. A chief physician at my hospital who goes to my church wrote an article urging hospital staff to sign an online petition opposing the bill and supporting the existing marriage system. On Sept. 18, Christian ministers held a press conference with leaders of other major religious groups to urge the public to oppose the bill.
The First Commandment states: “You shall have no other gods before me,” and in none of the stories in the Bible do Christians collaborate with people of other faiths. For Christian ministers to put aside this separation and join hands with religious rivals was an eye-opener that confused me.
I understand that some Christian leaders hope to participate in political reform to help promote justice and love of God in Taiwan and so they make every effort to support any activities in opposition to same-sex marriage.
The question is if they really have such great passion for all kinds of political reform. The Bible says that a husband and wife are no longer two, but one: “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” So I wonder why Christian leaders do not push for an amendment to ban divorce. After all, Taiwan’s divorce rate is the third-highest in the world, with an average of 153 couples filing for divorce every day.
If you have been working at a hospital long enough, you will see that often the people who sit at patients’ bedsides taking care of them are neighbors, fellow veterans, unmarried partners of many years or members from the same church. They may have even lived together under one roof, treating each other as family.
However, do you know what kind of treatment hospitals accord these companions? Because they are not the patients’ parents, spouses or biological children, they cannot be given details of the patient’s condition, or allowed to sign consent forms for medical exams or surgery — the right to make medical decisions rests solely with blood relatives who may be far away and who may even have abandoned the patients at the hospital.
Think of it this way: Jesus is receiving treatment at a hospital one day, but the attending physician refuses to reveal his condition to his 12 apostles. No matter how anxious or close they are, they have no right to know his condition since they have no legal relationship.
In 2004, the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan released the results of a study declaring that homosexuality is not a sin.
Of course, everyone has the right to show their support for or opposition to same-sex marriage. However, I am a Christian, and I truly hope that the legislature will pass the third reading of the bill for diversity in family formation.
Lee Yen-fan is an associate head nurse.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS