Small Taiwan has big pull
A few weeks ago, I attended this year’s cross-strait development conference held by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. Important topics discussed at this forum included Taiwan’s “guest” status at the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) triennial assembly and its international participation efforts.
I want to focus on the tendency among the conference speakers from Taiwan — in particular Arthur Shuh-fan Ding (丁樹範) — to downplay Taiwan and its ability to influence its own future.
At the forum, Ding characterized Taiwan as a “small actor” within a future G2 framework and emphasized the nation’s inability to affect the policies of the US and China.
As said by one of the US panelists, Cynthia Watson of the National Defense University, the statement that Taiwan has not exerted any influence on the US over the past 60 years is simply not true.
I would add that, especially since Taiwan is a relatively small country, it needs to strongly defend its sovereignty and freedom, as opposed to watering it down, as the present government is doing.
David Vital said that the aim of any small power is to “broaden the field of maneuver and choice, and increase the total resources on which the state can count in times of stress.”
Realizing this would require the actor in question to have certain leverage over larger actors within the same theater and contrary to what Ding claims, Taiwan has plenty.
Vibrant international participation is another salient characteristic of any small power. The lack of this has greatly impacted Taiwan’s ability to maintain the “status quo” of being a free and de facto independent country, which is what more than 85 percent of Taiwan’s population prefer at this moment. However, whatever Taiwan attempts to do on the international stage, it always finds China standing firmly in its way.
Another panelist at the conference, Huang Kuei-bo, said that Taiwan’s international participation hinges on China’s tacit understanding. I would propose that if Taiwan always waits for China’s “tacit understanding,” that automatically grants Beijing veto power over its participation in international organizations — a lose-lose situation.
However, this is what the policies that the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration has adopted since its inauguration are based on: avoiding confrontation and promoting goodwill toward China. It is clear from the experience of the past five years that this is a dead-end street.
A much better avenue is to promote the right of Taiwanese to be fully represented in the international community. This is the principle of universality as enshrined in the UN Charter.
So, instead of traveling the low road advocated by the government, Taiwan and its international friends need to voice the nation’s high aspirations and principles. Having such a moral high ground emanating from a democratic, liberal Taiwan will resonate within the congressional chambers of its strongest ally, the US.
This is why Taipei’s supporters in the US Congress have expressed their support for the country through countless congressional bills and resolutions over the years, with one recent example being the US Senate’s 579 bill, which directs the US Department of State to come up with a strategy for Taiwan gaining observer status in the ICAO.
A more resolute attitude toward international participation on Taiwan’s part would also ensure that the protective umbrella the nation enjoys under the Taiwan Relation Act of 1979 is not taken away.
Without a voice in the international arena, without the support and understanding of its friends and allies, Taiwan will eventually fall from the world stage and be relegated to a Chinese domestic issue to be dealt with as Beijing sees fit.
It is imperative that Taiwanese, united by their common concern and love for their country — as demonstrated through various recent ground-breaking civic movements — endeavor to build a civil society that builds on the transition to democracy that was achieved only 25 years ago and that can join the international family of nations as a full, equal member.
Charlie Liao
Washington
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
RSS