On Oct. 11, former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) director William Stanton delivered a talk in Taipei that was open to the public, titled “The Strategic Significance of Taiwan.” In addition to talking about well-known themes such as Taiwan’s economic development and democratic transformation from a geostrategic perspective, Stanton also examined the special strategic position the nation occupies in the first island chain to provide a reinterpretation of Taiwan’s strategic importance to the US as an unsinkable aircraft carrier and as a supply station for submarines.
The US has never viewed Taiwan as its unsinkable aircraft carrier. Instead, the US is worried that if Taiwan falls under the control of one of its “enemies,” Taiwan will become a military base that would affect maritime lines of communication in the west Pacific. If this were to happen, the nation would be forced into aligning itself against the US-Japan security alliance and Taiwanese would once again become hostages of conflicts between more powerful countries.
In the same vein, China is worried that with the support of their enemies, the safety of China’s maritime lines of communication would be compromised and the safety of the four provinces of Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian and Jiangsu would be threatened, which would impede China’s development.
However, due to the end of the Cold War and changes in the way war is waged, an independent, autonomous, stable and prosperous Taiwan is now in the common interest of all of Taiwan’s neighboring countries.
Taiwan has gone through a democratic transformation and is no longer some sort of “reactionary power” that will threaten development, as once believed by China. On the contrary, an independent, autonomous, stable and prosperous Taiwan provides a buffer zone and a place for reconciliation in the geopolitical competition going on between China and the US-Japan security alliance and helps create a safe environment for steady development in the Asia-Pacific region.
So to which country does Taiwan represent an unsinkable aircraft carrier? In terms of the overall safety and stability of the Asia-Pacific region, the only way to assure the safety of maritime lines of communication in the west Pacific, and guarantee continued peace and development in the Asia-Pacific region, is to have an independent, autonomous, stable and prosperous Taiwan.
While Taiwan’s strategic importance is undeniable, it is often overlooked.
In order to establish a more stable environment in the west Pacific, Washington should do more to assist Taiwan in playing a more active role in the Asia-Pacific region security mechanism. At the same time, Washington must be more active in assisting Taiwan to re-engage with the international community and to benefit from a more favorable cost-performance ratio with military upgrades.
At the same time, Beijing must also realize that only by having an independent, autonomous, stable and prosperous Taiwan can the strategic environment in the west Pacific be made stable, which is also the only way China can continue to experience peaceful development.
The nature of cross-strait relations is not dependent on politicians’ sound bites, but rather in how to go about using pragmatic approaches and taking actions beneficial to all Taiwanese to build common interests for the entire Asia-Pacific region.
Rong-i Arthur Hong is a former professor at National Defense University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
RSS