Human rights violations
Taiwan has been going through a political crisis this month. The Taiwanese Human Rights Association of Canada (THRAC) is concerned by the human rights violations and constitutional illegalities committed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration which have precipitated this crisis. Three concerns are:
First, the illegal and questionable actions of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division (SID). On Sept. 6, the SID said that in late June, a wiretap on Democratic Progressive Party caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) had provided evidence of improper lobbying by Legislative Speaker Yuan Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), former minister of justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫) and High Prosecutors’ Office Head Prosecutor Chen Shou-huang (陳守煌) on behalf of Ker.
On Aug. 31, Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) reported the wiretap privately to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) “because of its massive political ramifications.”
By reporting to the president and then releasing the transcript at a press conference — without laying any charges — the SID grossly violated laws requiring nondisclosure of its investigations and has confirmed suspicions that it is a political tool of the KMT. There are also questions about the legality and propriety of the wiretap.
THRAC commends the senior legal academics and the Law Times newspaper for initiating a lawsuit against the SID and calls on the legislature to abolish this tainted inquisitorial office altogether.
Second, the unconstitutional actions committed by Ma. The president accepted the disclosure from the SID and, on Sept. 8, he held a press conference at which he condemned Wang.
“If this was not improper influence, then what is?” he said.
These actions constituted (to use his words) “improper influence at the highest level,” abuse of the office of president and violation of the separation of powers fundamental to a democracy. Ma then acted in his capacity as KMT chairman to have Wang’s party membership suspended and remove him as a legislator-at-large.
This confusion of Ma’s two roles as president and party chairman looks like a return to the old party-state practices of the KMT.
Third, contempt of the legislature. By using an internal KMT party process to remove its speaker, Ma has seriously violated the rights of the legislature. The speaker of the legislature is elected by its members. The legislature oversees the president. Now Ma has used his power as party chairman to become the overseer of the legislature. This has serious implications for KMT proportional vote legislators who must worry about a party chairman who can remove them so easily.
The amalgam of questionable, illegal and unconstitutional actions in this crisis involves violations of human rights, the Constitution and legal process. THRAC strongly condemns the actions of the SID and of Ma in this matter. His actions threaten to bring the very legitimacy of his presidency into question.
If the political system cannot address such abuse of power, then the public needs to affirm their sovereignty and defend their rights through the peaceful exercise of direct democracy.
Michael Stainton
President of the Taiwanese Human Rights association of Canada
YouBikes are dangerous
Health warning: Taipei’s rental bikes, the YouBikes, are hazardous to the health.
For convenience, health and the environment, I recently began to use YouBikes. Since Taipei has almost no infrastructure for safe and convenient bike riding (“Wonderful Copenhagen,” Dec. 7, 2010, page 8), I mostly use the sidewalks, weaving my way through pedestrians, other cyclists and the many parked scooters.
It was all going well, but then it rained. Within a minute, I found that the wheels of the YouBikes are so smooth that they are only functional in dry weather and become as slippery as algal slime in the wet. After a bad tumble resulting in an open wound, I almost fell twice more until I resorted to pushing the YouBike back to its stand.
It is difficult to fathom why the bicycle’s makers would be so careless as to use slippery wheels, which are a health hazard given Taipei’s frequently rainy weather.
This is in line with the government’s continued failure to properly deal with environmental issues (“Fig leaf environmentalism,” June 11, 2012, page 8). Whether it is the government’s failure to protect water resources adequately (“Reservoir land laws changed,” Sept. 13, page 3), to protect citizens from corporations (“Activists protest Mailiao cracker expansion,” Sept. 5, page 3) or flooding due to bad land use policies and strengthening global warming (“Care needed with development,” Sept. 5, page 8), the utter uselessness of the Ma government in all matters environmental is on display again.
Thank God the courts at least protect us from the worst excesses of the government and corporate-sponsored assaults on our environmental well-being (“Court rules in favor of professor in Formosa lawsuit,” Sept. 5, page 3, and “Environmentalists hail ‘Tambei’ ruling,” Sept. 5, page 1).
Whether it is small issues like YouBike wheels or the ludicrous anti-idling law, or big issues like traffic policies, pollution control or land development, one can only conclude that there is a band of bureaucratic dilettantes with neither a grasp on reality nor any scientific background. These paper pushers are probably more concerned with their careers and pensions than with protecting and improving the lives of ordinary citizens.
YouBikes and the Ma government are hazardous to your health.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS