Political distraction is no laughing matter. People have quipped that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) latest approval rating of 9.2 percent perfectly reflects his Beijing-leaning tendencies, enshrined in his party’s so-called “1992 consensus,” and that the political battle between Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) is more entertaining than a prime time soap opera. However, the longer the distractions last, the higher the eventual costs.
Unfortunately, the power struggle within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is entering its second week and seems unlikely to end soon.
The alleged illegal lobbying, where Ma’s campaign originated from, is an important issue that should not be overlooked. However, after tasting defeat last week when the Taipei District Court upheld Wang’s provisional injunction to retain his party membership, Ma’s stubborn pursuit of his personal agenda spelled danger for both the KMT and the nation.
Ma began planning retaliation through an appeal of the court’s ruling, as well as a prohibition against Wang participating in the KMT’s party congress later this month, or any of its internal meetings. He then moved to shift attention away himself and the KMT’s infighting to the Democratic Progressive Party’s inability to deal with its caucus whip, Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘), accused by the Special Investigation Division (SID) of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office of asking Wang to influence a decision in his legal case.
Academics, politicians and civic groups have all expressed concerns that the constitutional process has been put at risk, and yet Ma appears unable to understand their unease, nor why his crackdown on alleged illegal lobbying has not been well-received by the public.
The opposition’s claim that the administration has jeopardized the constitutional process is legitimate. The SID apparently used illegal wiretapping, while never summoning those involved — Wang and Ker — for questioning. Prosecutor General Huang Shih-ming’s (黃世銘) direct report to Ma, as well as Ma and Premier Jiang Yi-huah’s (江宜樺) remarks about Wang’s “incompetence” as speaker, were all infringements of the separation of powers.
Within the KMT, a party schism could arise if Ma, as chairman, alienates the “local wing” led by Wang, leaving the KMT open to be a party dominated by Mainlanders again.
Ma’s refusal to compromise could also complicate the new legislative session, which begins today, with tensions likely to be high within the KMT camp, and more generally tainted with displeasure over his attempt to make the legislature a lackey under his command.
Political turmoil could make the legislative session useless, if the central government’s budget plan, the review of a cross-strait service trade agreement and a referendum proposal on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), all remain unresolved by the end of the three-month session.
While the public may not be interested in the Ma-Wang showdown — they know there is something wrong with the way the nation is heading.
The economy and issues related to people’s livelihood are not likely to be discussed or show up on the media’s radar in the coming months if this political power struggle continues.
This is the reason Ma must stop the strife in the KMT now. If he refuses, he might take the country down along with his bottom-skimming approval ratings.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS