Taiwanese residing overseas are yet again being mislabeled as citizens of the People’s Republic of China, with reports emerging this week that their nationality on residency certificates issued by immigration authorities in Norway and South Korea were designated as “Kina [China]-Taiwan” and “China (Taiwan)” respectively.
Officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said they have taken up the issue with the Norwegian and South Korean governments, but that both have refused to correct the mistakes, citing an adherence to the “one China” policy.
While such news no doubt infuriates many Taiwanese, there is perhaps a silver lining amid the frustration: Rather than growing numb to the blatant incorrectness, as some have long feared, Taiwanese are taking a stand and making their cases heard.
The case in Norway came to light after a Taiwanese student penned a letter to the op-ed page of the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the sister paper of the Taipei Times) voicing his “heartache” over his failed attempts requesting the Oslo government to correct the nationality on his residency card. As for South Korea, the Chinese-language Apple Daily ran a report after receiving multiple complaints from netizens over the wrong designation on their residency certificates.
Taiwan is a sovereign nation, with its own government, currency and territory. It elects its own government and negotiates its own treaties. It does not claim to represent China, although China has always sought — incorrectly — to claim Taiwan as part of its territory through incessant international campaigns.
While Taiwan has no control over how other countries choose to kowtow to Beijing, it is encouraging to see Taiwanese refusing to take such absurd notions lying down.
Self-respect gains respect. If Taiwanese do not raise their voices and demand a correction of the misunderstanding regarding their nationality, how can they expect countries, international organizations and the like to be aware that they have committed a mistake?
And even if a majority of the international community do not have the guts to stand up to China’s bullying, it does not mean that Taiwanese should act in the same spineless manner and quietly accept this continuing injustice without uttering a protest.
Silence is certainly not golden in the case of Taiwan’s plight.
While the people of Taiwan deserve applause for raising their voices on their own initiative and striving for due respect, Taiwanese officials’ ambivalence about the distinctions between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are not helping the cause.
After all, how is Taiwan to demand respect from other countries and expect them to address it by its correct name when the government itself commits such errors? Witness the recent controversy over the Taipei City Government’s advertisement at MRT stations, with its reference to China as neidi (內地, “inland”), a loaded term implying that China’s borders extend overseas to Taiwan.
It is cases like this highlighting government officials’ blatant show of disrespect for their own that is sowing confusion and cultivating the misconception among members of the international community that Taiwan is part of China.
Taiwan can fight international injustice — but only when the people and officials alike can raise their collective voice in accord.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS