Amid a public outcry over the controversial land grab case in Dapu Borough (大埔), in Miaoli County’s Jhunan Township (竹南), a planned project in Greater Tainan to move railroad tracks underground has sparked a new wave of concern over another possible forced demolition of residential properties.
The project, which was approved by the Executive Yuan in 2009, aimed to move an 8km long stretch of railroad track underground. To facilitate the project, the Greater Tainan Government plans to demolish more than 400 houses on the east side of the current tracks in downtown Tainan. When the project is completed, the original surface tracks are to be removed to make way for a park and a commercial district.
The land expropriation case in Greater Tainan has sparked protest from some households who accused Tainan Mayor William Lai (賴清德) of reaping the benefits of land expropriation and disregarding people’s property rights. They urged the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to pay as much attention to the case as it has to condemning Miaoli County Government Commissioner Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over his handling of the Dapu case.
Lai has insisted that the railroad project in Tainan is completely different from the Dapu case, because the expropriation of 62 hectares of land in Dapu was to benefit developers, with most of the seized land to be used to build residential and commercial complexes. The railroad project in Greater Tainan, on the other hand, is a major public construction project, with much of the land to be used for road construction to benefit the city, Lai said.
He also accused Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) of politicizing the issue and misleading the public by claiming that the Dapu and Greater Tainan cases shared similarities because both are land expropriations.
However valiantly government officials try to defend the two different land expropriation cases, the public should watch the two cases closely and continue to press authorities to respect the rights of the people in affected households.
Anger over the Dapu case and other controversial urban renewal projects, including the Huaguang (華光) community and the Wenlin Yuan (文林苑) case, in which the rights of house owners who refused to relocate were sacrificed, should be redirected to prevent any injustice against the residents in the Greater Tainan railroad underground project and other ongoing cases.
Both President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration and the opposition camp should quit playing the blame game and recognize disputes over land expropriation cases as political issues.
The nation will only witness more land expropriation cases in the name of urban redevelopment, and more mass and individual protests will be launched against unfair or corrupt expropriations and forced demolitions of privately owned properties.
The administrative and the legislative branches should discuss revision of the Land Expropriation Act (土地徵收條例), as anti-land-grab advocates continue to urge the government to scrap zone expropriation and have compensations be decided by three real-estate appraisers, instead of by the government’s land evaluation commission.
As politicians should stop politicizing the issue, the public must also look beyond party lines in monitoring the authorities’ handling of land expropriation cases to defend the rights of residents amid a growing number of urban renewal projects.
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
RSS